I would take that to be covered by d) above.
Are you
a) Arabic
b) Jewish
c) Christian
d) other
PS : Would you consider changing your subject enumeration from M to E so as not to get mixed up with mine?
Who am I? (M3)
57 posts
• Page 2 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
by underquark » Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:55 am
Are you a donkey? If not, can you exclude a donkey from having visited all these places?
- underquark
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 06 September 2005
by MCC » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:25 am
underquark wrote:Are you a male of the second millenium CE (as opposed to BC)?
You can take that as a yes.
underquark wrote:Are you a donkey?
No. Nor any other animal or beast.
underquark wrote:If not, can you exclude a donkey from having visited all these places?
No I cannot.
emm wrote:...c) Christian
This man was born of Catholic parents.
emm wrote:PS : Would you consider changing your subject enumeration from M to E so as not to get mixed up with mine?
I have taken your request re: re-enumeration my subject enumeration under consideration and will comply with your request, although I will not be using E as E-numbers are additives and additives are banned, therefore, in future, I will go by the symbol &
MCC
- MCC
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: 08 June 2005
by underquark » Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:47 pm
You can't ban E100 as it is widely used in the cooking of this region.
- underquark
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 06 September 2005
by MCC » Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:44 pm
underquark wrote:You can't ban E100 as it is widely used in the cooking of this region.
Anyone for a curry
I'll E1510 to that.
It was a bit unwise of me to ban all E-numbers.
Ok then, back to the riddle - Can anyone see what it is yet
- No. Time for a clue then. What
That was a clue, oh well, maybe it'll send them in the right direction.MCC
Spotted a spelling mistake.
Last edited by MCC on Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- MCC
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: 08 June 2005
by emm » Sun Aug 20, 2006 2:19 am
underquark, you aren't concentrating!
A 2nd millennium Catholic with a Jewish connection who applied himself energetically in his endeavours - Adolf Hitler.
Nein? Time fuhrer another clue?
Thanks! but ?
A 2nd millennium Catholic with a Jewish connection who applied himself energetically in his endeavours - Adolf Hitler.
Nein? Time fuhrer another clue?
MCC wrote:in future, I will go by the symbol &
Thanks! but ?
- emm
- Posts: 987
- Joined: 02 July 2005
by MCC » Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:51 am
5 days and still on the wrong track, looks like the misdirection is working too well.
Let's try and get you back on the right track.
I have tried to answer your posts as best I can but as all your posts are irrelevant, so are my answers to them (well not entirely, but there is truth in them).
You have tried direct thinking and it's leading you in the wrong direction, why not try another angle - lateral thinking.
emm asks why "&"
A prince by another name - "&" formerly M.
MCC
Let's try and get you back on the right track.
I have tried to answer your posts as best I can but as all your posts are irrelevant, so are my answers to them (well not entirely, but there is truth in them).
You have tried direct thinking and it's leading you in the wrong direction, why not try another angle - lateral thinking.
Clue:
Place and position are relevant.
emm asks why "&"
A prince by another name - "&" formerly M.
MCC
- MCC
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: 08 June 2005
by MCC » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:48 pm
tarek wrote:was he known as Christopher on a specific Monday ????
I don't understand the reference, but not relevant.
tarek wrote:I've got the M. & I think the link from your clues to the person is 1 Timothy (Rearranged).....
That's the trouble, anything I post is taken as a hint, the "M" and "&" relate to a personal request by emm and as such have no relevance to the riddle.
There are no anagrams.
tarek wrote:Tell me if I'm chasing a red herring........
Gone fishing
tarek wrote:If that was too much lateral thinking then my answer would be......
SATAN or Gog
Neither SATAN or Gog or even Magog (I wonder what ever happened to Pagog?).
MCC
- MCC
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: 08 June 2005
by emm » Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:43 am
Good, I can stop looking for anagrams of Timothy which was giving me a headache.
We're not fishing here, we're floundering. We need to narrow it down a bit.
Are you
a) a good guy
b) just average
c) a dirty rotten scoundrel ?
Re : Your name &. It's very cryptic. Are you referring to TAFKAP?
We're not fishing here, we're floundering. We need to narrow it down a bit.
Are you
a) a good guy
b) just average
c) a dirty rotten scoundrel ?
Re : Your name &. It's very cryptic. Are you referring to TAFKAP?
- emm
- Posts: 987
- Joined: 02 July 2005
by MCC » Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:23 am
emm wrote:Good, I can stop looking for anagrams of Timothy which was giving me a headache.
We're not fishing here, we're floundering. We need to narrow it down a bit.
You certainly do need a different angle in the search for this person.
emm wrote:Are you
a) a good guy
b) just average
c) a dirty rotten scoundrel ?
c) a dirty rotten scoundrel
emm wrote:Re : Your name &. It's very cryptic. Are you referring to TAFKAP?
TAFKAP, yes, but he's changed it back again to prince, hasn't he
MCC
- MCC
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: 08 June 2005
by udosuk » Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:39 am
MCC wrote:TAFKAP, yes, but he's changed it back again to prince, hasn't he :?
According to this, from 1993 to 2000 he was addressed as
...I guess he has become TAFKATAFKAP...
I wouldn't say this person is bad enough to qualify as "a dirty rotten scoundrel"... Perhaps another fellow American artist (a certain ranch owner) would do...
- udosuk
- Posts: 2698
- Joined: 17 July 2005
57 posts
• Page 2 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
