Paquita wrote:This is funny
98765.43.64.3......53......57..36...3.497...5.9.4.5..3.3..6.28....793.........3..
9.76..4..64.3......53......57...6...3.497...5.9.4.5..3....6.28....79..........3..
Although I use T&E(2) seeds now, I still get T&E(3) puzzles, like these : the first is an expanded, T&E(2), 11.7, the second a minimal (T&E(3), 11.8) of the first. I think it is because I now expand puzzles, there are more like these in my recent results. Not only is the minimal higher rated, it has become another T&E. (the puzzle is already in the T&E(3) file).
Hi Paquita
Maybe you didn't post the right 1st puzzle, but 98765.43.64.3......53......57..36...3.497...5.9.4.5..3.3..6.28....793.........3.. is in T&E(1), with SER 9.1.
Remember that for proving that a puzzle is in T&E(2) with SudoRules, you have to prove two things:
- it can be solved with T&E(2)
- it can't be solved with T&E(1)
Is the result surprising? Not that much. When starting from some non-minimal puzzle, there's not much one can say about puzzles obtained by deleting one or more givens - in particular about its minimals - except that they can't be strictly easier in the T&E hierarchy and the B, BpB or BpBB sub-classifications (which is already better than what you can say about their SER).
What would be surprising (and impossible) is the case where the first puzzle would be the expansion of the second.
.