The New Sudoku Players' Forum

by **g.r.emlin** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:35 am

::: game 0092 status LIGHTNING 2009-10-15+05:35:08-0000 :::

Code: Select all: game 0092 2009-10-13+20:00:00-0000 LIGHTNING duration 1d09h dealer m_b_metcalf pages 321-328 (open) 4 players ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.2/1.2/1.2 m_b_metcalf 4.0/4.0/3.6 JPF 7.0/7.0/2.6 JPF 8.3/8.3/8.3 gsf 1.5/1.5/1.5 JPF 4.2/4.2/4.2 m_b_metcalf 7.1/7.1/7.1 gsf 8.4/8.4/8.3 gsf 2.0/2.0/2.0 JPF 4.4/4.4/2.6 JPF 7.2/7.2/7.1 m_b_metcalf 8.5/8.5/7.2 champagne 2.3/2.3/2.3 JPF 4.5/4.5/2.6 m_b_metcalf 7.3/7.3/7.3 gsf 8.6/8.6/8.2 gsf 2.5/2.5/2.5 gsf 5.0/2.8/2.6 champagne 7.4/7.4/7.2 m_b_metcalf 8.7/8.7/4.2 m_b_metcalf 2.6/2.6/2.6 gsf 5.6/4.2/2.6 champagne 7.5/7.5/2.6 m_b_metcalf 8.8/8.8/7.8 gsf 2.8/2.8/2.8 gsf 5.7/3.4/2.6 champagne 7.6/7.6/2.6 m_b_metcalf 8.9/8.9/8.5 gsf 3.0/3.0/3.0 gsf 6.2/6.2/2.6 JPF 7.7/7.7/2.6 m_b_metcalf 9.0/9.0/8.9 m_b_metcalf 3.2/2.8/2.6 champagne 6.6/6.6/6.6 champagne 7.8/7.8/2.6 m_b_metcalf 9.1/9.1/8.7 gsf 3.4/3.4/3.4 gsf 6.7/6.7/6.7 m_b_metcalf 7.9/7.9/2.6 JPF 9.2/9.2/9.1 m_b_metcalf 3.6/3.6/3.6 gsf 6.8/6.8/2.6 JPF 8.0/6.6/2.6 champagne 9.3/9.3/8.8 gsf 3.8/3.8/2.6 JPF 6.9/6.6/2.6 champagne 8.2/8.2/2.6 m_b_metcalf 9.4/9.3/2.6 JPF ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ open ratings : 1.7 4.6-4.9 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.8-6.1 6.5 8.1 9.5-11.4 submitter entries score response notes ----------- ------- ----- -------- ----- champagne 8 1312 12m56s rare-0*20,rare-1,rare-2,diamond,pearl,bad-submission*2,se-mismatch JPF 11 1581 21m36s rare-1*3,pearl*7,highest-rating=506 gsf 15 1773 34m55s rare-0*2,rare-1*2,rare-2,diamond*9,pearl*6 m_b_metcalf 14 1860 25m51s rare-0*4,rare-2,diamond*2,pearl*11,last-entry=286,dealer ----------- ------- ----- ----- 4 48 6526 rare-0*26,rare-1*6,rare-2*3,diamond*12,pearl*25

by **gsf** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:36 am

Code: Select all: . . 1 . 8 6 . . 4 . 6 . 5 . . . . 2 7 . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . 8 . . 2 . . 9 . . 6 . . 7 . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5 . . . . 7 . 2 . 4 . . 9 5 . 1 . . ED=8.5/8.5/8.4

by **m_b_metcalf** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:47 am

Code: Select all: . . 1 . 2 3 . . 4 . 5 . 1 . . . . 6 7 . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . 3 . . 4 . . 7 . . 2 . . 2 . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 . . . . 7 . 4 . 5 . . 6 8 . 9 . . ED=1.7/1.2/1.2

Regards,

Mike Metcalf

by **gsf** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:55 am

Code: Select all: . . 1 . 3 6 . . 4 . 6 . 8 . . . . 3 7 . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . 8 . . 2 . . 9 . . 6 . . 7 . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5 . . . . 1 . 9 . 4 . . 9 5 . 1 . . ED=4.6/3.0/3.0

by **champagne** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:19 am

Code: Select all: 009087006 050400003 200000000 000300020 060010030 010009000 000000004 700001050 500760800 ED=4.6/3.4/2.6

by **gsf** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:11 am

Code: Select all: . . 1 . 2 3 . . 4 . 8 . 4 . . . . 3 7 . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . 9 . . 2 . . 3 . . 6 . . 5 . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5 . . . . 6 . 7 . 4 . . 3 5 . 2 . . ED=5.8/2.0/2.0

by **champagne** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:14 am

Code: Select all: 009087006 050400003 200000000 000100020 020060090 010008000 000000002 700003060 400790500 ED=7.2/7.2/7.2

by **JPF** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:35 am

Code: Select all: . . 1 | . 2 3 | . . 4 . 5 . | 4 . . | . . 6 7 . . | . . . | . . . -------+-------+------- . . . | 3 . . | . 8 . . 3 . | . 9 . | . 1 . . 8 . | . . 1 | . . . -------+-------+------- . . . | . . . | . . 8 2 . . | . . 9 | . 7 . 4 . . | 2 6 . | 5 . . ED=4.7/3.0/2.6

JPF

by **m_b_metcalf** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:01 am

Code: Select all: . . 1 . 2 3 . . 4 . 4 . 5 . . . . 3 2 . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . 4 . . 6 . . 1 . . 7 . . 5 . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . 7 8 . . . . 9 . 6 . 7 . . 8 4 . 1 . . ED=9.1/9.1/8.8

Regards,

Mike Metcalf

by **JPF** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:11 am

Code: Select all: . . 1 | . 2 3 | . . 4 . 5 . | 6 . . | . . 2 7 . . | . . . | . . . -------+-------+------- . . . | 8 . . | . 9 . . 3 . | . 7 . | . 5 . . 4 . | . . 2 | . . . -------+-------+------- . . . | . . . | . . 6 5 . . | . . 6 | . 1 . 6 . . | 9 1 . | 7 . . ED=6.5/3.4/2.6

JPF

by **champagne** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:23 am

::: resign :::

Hi all,

having to leave for several days, I take that opportunity to test the resign procedure.

I guess it will rreduce the number of players, but I am not 100% sure.

May- be all my submissions will be discarded?? I will see.

I enjoyed very much that test run and I have now a better idea of what i still have to do to participate with an "acceptable" score.

I will likely skip several games, but I will surely come back.

champagne

PS: the entry barrier is definitely very high.

by **m_b_metcalf** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:30 am

::: comment :::

champagne wrote:::: resign :::

Hi all,

having to leave for several days, I take that opportunity to test the resign procedure.

I guess it will rreduce the number of players, but I am not 100% sure.

May- be all my submissions will be discarded?? I will see.

I enjoyed very much that test run and I have now a better idea of what i still have to do to participate with an "acceptable" score.

I will likely skip several games, but I will surely come back.

champagne,
It was good to have you aboard. Resigning means only that the number of active players is reduced. It has no practical consequences. I'll be away myself soon, so the others will be on their tod.

Regards,

Mike Metcalf

by **champagne** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:36 am

::: comment :::

m_b_metcalf wrote:::: comment :::

Resigning means only that the number of active players is reduced. It has no practical consequences. I'll be away myself soon, so the others will be on their tod.

Regards,

Mike Metcalf

Hi Mike,

I thought that reducing the count of active players form 4 to 3 would at least change the delay for game closure.

regards

champagne

by **Pat** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:49 am

champagne wrote:I thought that reducing the count of active players form 4 to 3 would at least change the delay for game closure.

good question for gsf
i'm surprised he hadn't answered when you asked previously (page 321)

by **champagne** » Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:05 am

Pat wrote:
champagne wrote:I thought that reducing the count of active players form 4 to 3 would at least change the delay for game closure.

good question for gsf
i'm surprised he hadn't answered when you asked previously (page 321)

It is not any more a question.
The situation is there, we will see what happens.

champagne

The New Sudoku Players' Forum

Patterns Game