m_b_metcalf wrote:::: comment :::
gsf wrote:right now the referee accepts posts with no ``/pearl-index'', i.e., SE=explainer-rating/pearl-index
probably by the next game it will be required
Well, I've also 'rolled my own' and I check that result with SS before posting a strong Pearl. It seems a pity to have to have recourse to yet another program before being allowed to play (does it run under all versions of Windows?). This would seem to be an obstacle to attracting new players. I suppose I could just add /99 and cross my fingers!
SS is tied to windows and is not under development should problems arise
the biggest obstacle (running (and wating for) SE in command line mode) has already been hurdled
my solver runs in command line mode on windows and linux
and you can compile for any other unix/mac architecture (or I can do it for you)
I don't think my solver, modulo initial shock at the --man docs, has been an impediment to other threads on the forums
if you use it as part of patterns game play I'm pretty sure it will not be the bottleneck
and the upshot: the only way I'll code and babysit the referee is with linux command line interfaces