m_b_metcalf wrote:::: comment :::
g.r.emlin wrote:::: adjustment :::
- Code: Select all
2008-01-22+19:13:00-0000 m_b_metcalf dup-puzzle -50
Yes, this is clearly true. However, I was misled by a pearl rating of only 13 for a puzzle that I'm sure is 99 (I checked it with SS directly)! What's wrong? And who is now allowed to play next?
pearl indices are computed by my solver instead of by simple sudoku
for many reasons, the main being the referee runs as a shell script on linux, not windows
my solver does not emulate SS exactly, and as noted just before game 0013, and in the updated rules,
differences may show up in coloring/multi-coloring
right now my solver is the final arbiter
those posts have the options to print the pearl index
if someone wants to code SS coloring for my solver I'd be glad to add it in
(constraint methods are pretty much independent modules and are easy to add in;
coding to the internal grid api is however a hurdle)
right now the referee accepts posts with no ``/pearl-index'', i.e., SE=explainer-rating/pearl-index
probably by the next game it will be required
you'll notice that my posts have EP=explainer-rating/pearl-index (for explainer/pearl)
the referee checks the actual pearl index against the submission, and mismatches are marked invalid
this should help the other players keep track of ratings/pearls until the next status post
penalized/adjusted posts do not count as a submission (but that code branch may not have
been tested yet)