gsf wrote:m_b_metcalf wrote:Off Topic.For collectors, two Pearls:
- Code: Select all
000012300000400000406008200508000060900070005020000109003500608000006000009340000 # SE 9.0
000012300000800000805004100308000060600050002040000901004600503000001000006940000 # SE 8.2
thanks for the pearl ref
for the first move using SS constraint order, I get locked-candidates for the 9.0 and naked quad for the 8.2
and from the ref it looks like that makes them
not pearl
I don't use SS, nor do I intend to. According to the definition:
gurth wrote:PEARLS, RUBIES, GARNETS, EMERALDS, ETC.
For quick reference, definitions of above terms :
PEARL :
A Pearl is a minimal sudoku where the first solvable cell is difficult to solve. The more difficult, the greater the pearl and its value.
both qualify according to SE. If I step through SE with them, the SE 9.0 puzzle requires a number of steps, starting at 2.6 and rising to 9.0, before
solving the first cell. The 8.2 one is similar, going from 3.4 via 7.3, before the first cell is solved.
If it's hard to get agreement between programs, maybe we should just drop the idea.
Regards,
Mike Metcalf