JPF wrote:m_b_metcalf wrote:Testing
OK so far.
- Code: Select all
. . . 1 2 3 . . .
. . 4 . . . 5 . .
6 7 . . . . . 1 8
. . 3 . . . 4 . .
. . . 5 . 1 . . .
. . . . 8 . . . .
. . . . 9 . . . .
. . . 4 . 8 . . .
. 1 6 . . . 9 3 . SE=7.3
JPF
Forgive me for going off topic for a second, but your puzzle JPF is an excellent example of a couple of UR deductions that occur quite often but rarely seem to make much of a difference. After easy stuff, we get to
- Code: Select all
.------------------.------------------.------------------.
| 59 59 8 | 1 2 3 | 67 4 67 |
| 1 3 4 | 8 6 7 | 5 29* 29* |
| 6 7 2 | 9 4 5 | 3 1 8 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
| 25 8 3 | 26 7 9 | 4 256 1 |
| 2479- 2469% 79 | 5 3 1 | 8 2679- 2679*|
| 2579 2569 1 | 26 8 4 | 267 25679 3 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
| 247% 24% 57 | 3 9 6 | 1 8 257 |
| 3 29- 579 | 4 1 8 | 267 267 2567 |
| 8 1 6 | 7 5 2 | 9 3 4 |
'------------------'------------------'------------------'
where we can immediately deduce r5c1<>2 and r5c8<>2 using the potential deadly patterns in r57c12[24] and r25c89[29], respectively. For those keeping score at home, the first is type UR+3C/2SL, the second is type UR+2B/1SL. After this a finned x-wing (or alternatively a 2-string kite) forces r8c2<>2, and the puzzle is solved.