Ocean wrote:If a selection criteria is needed (say, the day you should decide to publish a collection), then rather than the artificial "100 first submitted", maybe the "15 or 20 best from each symmetry type, at time of publication" would be more natural.
Agree, its fair even if my handicapped generator will not enable me to be in the final list
Ocean wrote:I think the one-, two-, three-steppers, etc. belong to separate classes, and can not be compared directly. For low-steppers the number of clues is crucial: lower number of clues = better quality. For the sake of diversity, it's interesting to divide in symmetry types: what is the best we can achieve for each symmetry type.
Im a bit confused.
Would it be possible to set up the updated low-steppers list with the required ranking of the different criteria ?
JPF