Explain these logically (1-5)

Anything goes, but keep it seemly...

Postby coloin » Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:01 pm

-1-

I am watching you suffer here.

If you ask the question many times you will get the answer !

C
coloin
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: 05 May 2005

Postby Hud » Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:03 pm

CTU is responsible for all security at the meeting and no local policemen can be on the premises.
Also the policeman didn't have a donut in his hand.
Hud
 
Posts: 570
Joined: 29 October 2005

Postby MCC » Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:49 pm

Ok then, the policeman that Jack Fox disguised himself as, was recently killed on duty.


MCC
MCC
 
Posts: 1275
Joined: 08 June 2005

Postby udosuk » Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:19 am

I wrote:The agents have never seen any face among these 4 people, and do not know the identity of any of them.

So forget any ID lists or recently killed cops...

I think coloin & underquark already knew the answer...

I posted this on another forum, and not only was it solved quickly, they're already onto the twist of the story which involves Paris Hilton & Jack Bauer...

Should reveal all by tomorrow...
udosuk
 
Posts: 2698
Joined: 17 July 2005

Postby coloin » Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:14 am

-1-
Its difficult to give a clue here without making it too easy , or without "spilling the beans".

My attempt to "help" MCC was in line with many of his......!

coloin wrote:If you ask the question many times you will get the answer !


The Question = "WHY" = ?

Many times = seven "times" = seven " ?"

Perhaps still obscure, but I suppose the pleasure thet one gets from solving these riddles is getting the answer oneself.

If you get the answer perhaps you can get "revenge" on MCC by posting another "hint" !

C
coloin
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: 05 May 2005

Postby MCC » Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:14 pm

udosuk wrote:I posted this on another forum, and not only was it solved quickly, they're already onto the twist of the story which involves Paris Hilton & Jack Bauer...

I hadn't realised this was a competition.
The journey's the most interesting part, so interesting in fact, that one might not reach the intended destination.

udosuk wrote:However, without any hesitation the agents all fire at the policeman in the head, killing him instantly. WHY?

To be pedantic - If they had not killed him instantly, he'd set the bomb off.

It was so hot that the electrician, the trucker and the secuity guard were working topless, so were shown not to be concealing bombs.

No policemen were supposed to be on duty in the garage therefore the policeman was the bomber.

The policeman had a sign with the words 'I am the bomber' written on it.


MCC
MCC
 
Posts: 1275
Joined: 08 June 2005

Re: Explain these logically (1-5)

Postby hr » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:17 pm

1.

Jack is known to be a man, those three others are women?
hr
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 July 2006

Re: Explain these logically (1-5)

Postby hr » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:21 pm

3 already answered
Last edited by hr on Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
hr
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 July 2006

Re: Explain these logically (1-5)

Postby hr » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:22 pm

4 this too, sorry
Last edited by hr on Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
hr
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 July 2006

Re: Explain these logically (1-5)

Postby hr » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:25 pm

5 a shallow river?
hr
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 July 2006

Re: Explain these logically (1-5)

Postby hr » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:28 pm

hr wrote:5 a shallow river?


it is a shallow river, because it flows rapidly!
hr
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 July 2006

Re: Explain these logically (1-5)

Postby hr » Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:37 pm

udosuk wrote:-2-
Jane, the personnel manager of the financial company on the 53rd floor can stand no more. Breaking the window glass with her chair


She breaks the window with HER chair, so she has to be in her office, but maybe her office is not on the 53rd floor, because personnel management does not necessarily share the same office space with those doing the financial stuff ... her office is on the basement floor?


Well... is this wrong? My english comprehension is not perfect ...
hr
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 July 2006

Re: Explain these logically (1-5)

Postby fermat » Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:58 pm

hr wrote:1.

Jack is known to be a man, those three others are women?


Good one, yet he is a disguiser, it may be 50/50 which sex he picked.
fermat
 
Posts: 105
Joined: 29 March 2006

#1

Postby fermat » Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:01 pm

His hat said "N Why P D"?
fermat
 
Posts: 105
Joined: 29 March 2006

Postby coloin » Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:17 pm

MCC wrote:The journey's the most interesting part, so interesting in fact, that one might not reach the intended destination.

I totally agree. No offence intended, I was wanting other people to come up with a clever clue, that you would solve.

MCC wrote:It was so hot that the electrician, the trucker and the security guard were working topless, so were shown not to be concealing bombs.

Yes Yes Yes !

That would have been it !

As revealed by hr

The policeman's 23rd pair of chromosomes = XY
The electrician, the trucker and the security guard = are all XX,XX,XX.

Apologies for any sexist comments.

My thanks go to udosuk for his posers.

C [XY]
coloin
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: 05 May 2005

PreviousNext

Return to Coffee bar