Smythe Dakota wrote:Mani wrote: .... I had made an assumption at one point, like D1 or D2 (D for direction). And let's say I chose D1, within that, I had to choose D11 or D12 and I picked up one and yet I landed the right solution without having to repeat an alternative track. ....
-- Which means you found a solution without meeting what many of us feel is an obligation, namely, to establish uniqueness. Hmm.
As you know Bill, I agree with you, but to each his own.
Mani, I have a question for you. Suppose D1 had worked out badly. Could you have gotten back to the point at which you chose D1, after trying D11, and D12? As far as I can tell you can save only one version of the puzzle in the atk web app, so if you attempt a "multi-level T&E" and your first guess is wrong, there's no easy way to get back to the point at which you made it.
Yesterday, I was working a medium when I got stuck and resorted to T&E. In one cell my candidates were 2 and 6, and when I tried the 2, it turned out to be the correct guess. As Bill would have done, I went back to my saved version, and tried to show that the 6 was wrong, but I quickly got stuck and I thought another level of T&E would be necessary. I didn't know how to deal with this problem. Fortunately, I eventually saw that I had missed an inference that made even the first level of T&E unnecessary.
One thing that I don't like about the atk interface is that when you solve the puzzle, the saved version is erased, so in a case like this, you have to be careful not to fill in the last cell, if you want to go back and establish uniqueness.