Bigtone53 wrote:As neither the setter nor the solver, it is not my place to give hints but I will be fascinated to see how MCC or udosuk give a further hint without just giving the answer away!
Speaking for myself, when a riddle has been correctly solved, I would prefer the answer be posted by MCC - say in a very small font size - rather than continue on with more hints. The answer can be easily read simply by clicking on the quote button and increasing the font size and select the "Preview" button.
I'm assuming there are others like myself who still may not have solved this (and other) riddles when another person knowing the answer posts a concealed hint(s) themselves which MCC can then detect that person knows the correct answer but which is still not obvious to others. The downside is that if a riddle is solved early then it's not as interesting as one which lingers on.
As I see it, not knowing the answer to a "solved" riddle leaves me with two choices:
(a) continue "asking" for more hints which, whilst somewhat embarressing, will eventually produce the answer.
(b) conceal my embarressment by saying nothing which becomes frustrating in not knowing the answer. I prefer choice (a).
tarek wrote:I don't want to sound
BACKWARD, but did anyone read my previous post
tarek in his previous post wrote:Lord
Brocket: "
BRUSH UR Y TI RELEC"
Sorry Tarek but I did read your "hint" and couldn't understand it. I assumed MCC was refering to your "hint" by saying "It has nothing to do with a particular person".
Well I'm "looking up" and "looking down" but the problem is I don't know what I'm looking for but will continue to soldier on whilst also watching the interesting ODI cricket match.
Cec