Very impressing to see how the "toughest" have progressed during the past 6 months. If you want a date for the Escargot, it was first published in "Aamulehti" on October 25th 2006. Thanks again ravel for the hard work!
RW
Mauricio wrote:Hey Ravel, you have at least 6 pairs of isomorphic puzzles in your recent list and I suspect there are more.
The culprits are (I had 8 pairs of suspects, but 2 were non isomorphic, I checked them by hand)
dml155 - dml11
dml13 - dml14
dml35 - dml36
dml22- dml160
dml159- dml20
dml26 - dml29
I suggest that someone with a program that can check for duplicates scans your list and then he or she posts the duplicates.
Mauricio wrote:Hey Ravel, you have at least 6 pairs of isomorphic puzzles in your recent list and I suspect there are more.
sudoku -qFN -f'%#0c %#0v "%i"' h-dml.dat |
sort |
uniq -Dseparate -w81 |
cut -d' ' -f2-3 |
sudoku -qFN -P -Fb'%#0v "%i"'
001002000030040050600700800008000007010000030900000500002001006040050020000600900
500004300070020000008100006009000007010000080400000200900003700000040050006700001
ravel wrote:
I also thought that dml would check for isomorphic puzzles now.
ravel wrote:[Added:] gsf, i just noticed, that i got slightly different ratings for the isomorphic dml21 and dml24 (99954 and 99951).
gsf wrote:ravel wrote:[Added:] gsf, i just noticed, that i got slightly different ratings for the isomorphic dml21 and dml24 (99954 and 99951).
although batching helps, some of the lower level techniques are sensitive to
orientation, and this creeps into the proposition logic
#
# gsfr: "no-solution" (or more correct: no rating)
# ER: 10.7
#
*-----------*
|...|..1|.2.|
|3..|.4.|5..|
|...|6..|..7|
|---+---+---|
|..2|...|..6|
|.5.|.3.|.8.|
|4..|...|9..|
|---+---+---|
|9..|..2|...|
|.8.|.5.|4..|
|..1|7..|...|
*-----------*
tarek wrote:gsf wrote:ravel wrote:[Added:] gsf, i just noticed, that i got slightly different ratings for the isomorphic dml21 and dml24 (99954 and 99951).
although batching helps, some of the lower level techniques are sensitive to
orientation, and this creeps into the proposition logic
May be another option should be added to the program..........
-RGIx where x>1 : basically it goes through the same process again but with a random isomorhphic puzzle up to x times & returns the samllest rating (RGI:randomly generated isomorph )
Merry Christmas
Ocean wrote:Here is a Christmas present for gsf:
- Code: Select all
# gsfr: "no-solution" (or more correct: no rating)
# ER: 10.7
*-----------*
|...|..1|.2.|
|3..|.4.|5..|
|...|6..|..7|
|---+---+---|
|..2|...|..6|
|.5.|.3.|.8.|
|4..|...|9..|
|---+---+---|
|9..|..2|...|
|.8.|.5.|4..|
|..1|7..|...|
*-----------*
5678 4679 456789 | 35 789 1 | 368 2 3489
3 1267 678 | 289 4 789 | 5 169 189
1258 1249 4589 | 6 289 35 | 138 349 7
---------------------+---------------------+---------------------
178 1379 2 | 14589 1789 45789 | 137 3457 6
167 5 679 | 1249 3 4679 | 127 8 124
4 1367 3678 | 128 12678 5678 | 9 1357 1235
---------------------+---------------------+---------------------
9 3467 34567 | 1348 168 2 | 13678 13567 1358
267 8 367 | 139 5 369 | 4 1679 1239
256 2346 1 | 7 689 3489 | 2368 3569 23589
udosuk wrote:BTW gsf, could you list out the backdoor twin cells to solve it with singles please? Thanks!
sudoku -qFN -f%#Am ocean.dat
[11]6{[69]2}
[15]7{[69]2}
[17]3{[69]2}
[23]7{[69]2}
[26]8{[69]2}
[54]2{[83]6}
[66]7{[69]2}
[69]2{[83]6}
gsf wrote:here's the point where the propositions including multicoloring stall