The New Sudoku Players' Forum

[gsf]

Code: Select all

. 1 . . 2 . . 3 .
3 . 4 . . . 5 . 6
. 6 . . . . . 9 .
. . . 8 . . . . .
7 . . . 5 . . . 8
. . . . . 9 . . .
. 8 . . . . . 6 .
5 . 9 . . . 3 . 4
. 7 . . 9 . . 1 .  ED=2.5/2.3/2.3

[Patrice]

Code: Select all

. 1 . . 2 . . 3 .
3 . 4 . . . 5 . 1
. 5 . . . . . 6 .
. . . 7 . . . . .
6 . . . 1 . . . 8
. . . . . 8 . . .
. 8 . . . . . 1 .
7 . 5 . . . 3 . 4
. 4 . . 9 . . 5 .   ED=5.2/2.0/2.0

Regards

[ronk]

::: comment :::

It seems that gremlin makes 2 adjustements for the same erroneous post at 2011/12/08 16:33 (this one should be 4.6 and not 4.8)
and it forget to take my post at 2011/12/09 07:24 in account !!!

I doubt the two are related. Besides, failing to score a puzzle is hardly an "adjustment."

The first is likely due to an Explainer bug, known for some time and which only occasionally rears its ugly head. We all have the same chance of being its victim.

[Patrice]

::: comment :::

ronk,

if you look at the 2 adjustment post by gremlin, they refer to the same post

de g.r.emlin » Jeu Déc 08, 2011 4:34 pm

::: adjustment 2011-12-08+16:33:00-0000 Patrice se-mismatch -100 :::

and

de g.r.emlin » Ven Déc 09, 2011 1:59 pm

::: adjustment 2011-12-08+16:33:00-0000 Patrice se-mismatch -100 :::

as you see the reference to my post in the form of a "time stamp" is the same...

and my puzzle in the post

de Patrice » Ven Déc 09, 2011 7:24 am

Code: Select all

. 1 . . 2 . . 3 .
2 . 4 . . . 5 . 6
. 3 . . . . . 7 .
. . . 4 . . . . .
3 . . . 7 . . . 8
. . . . . 5 . . .
. 7 . . . . . 1 .
6 . 5 . . . 9 . 3
. 2 . . 8 . . 4 .   ED=8.5/8.5/2.6

is not in the list of results

So what to do with the 8.5/8.5/2.6 now ?

[champagne]

::: comment :::

It seems that gremlin makes 2 adjustements for the same erroneous post at 2011/12/08 16:33 (this one should be 4.6 and not 4.8)
and it forget to take my post at 2011/12/09 07:24 in account !!!

Eyh gremlin you loose your head !

I made some tests on my side

serate 32 bits rates it as posted
serate 64 bits rates it as posted
and skfr does the same, what was not granted.

may be gremlin found the game boring and put some fun in it

champagne

[gsf]

Code: Select all

. 9 . . 1 . . 3 .
3 . 4 . . . 5 . 6
. 5 . . . . . 8 .
. . . 9 . . . . .
8 . . . 6 . . . 7
. . . . . 7 . . .
. 4 . . . . . 5 .
9 . 2 . . . 1 . 4
. 6 . . 2 . . 9 .  ED=2.6/2.3/2.3

[Patrice]

::: comment :::

Hi champagne !

I made also the test after my post : no difference between java 32 or 64 bits
For the first mismatch : i had a bug in my own rating tool, i will correct it before the next game.

will you participate to a next game ?

[Patrice]

Code: Select all

. 1 . . 2 . . 3 .
4 . 2 . . . 5 . 1
. 6 . . . . . 2 .
. . . 4 . . . . .
7 . . . 6 . . . 8
. . . . . 9 . . .
. 3 . . . . . 7 .
9 . 1 . . . 3 . 4
. 7 . . 8 . . 6 .   ED=3.8/3.4/2.6

[gsf]

Code: Select all

. 9 . . 1 . . 8 .
3 . 4 . . . 5 . 6
. 5 . . . . . 7 .
. . . 6 . . . . .
2 . . . 4 . . . 8
. . . . . 9 . . .
. 3 . . . . . 5 .
5 . 8 . . . 3 . 4
. 6 . . 2 . . 9 .  ED=6.5/2.0/2.0

[Patrice]

Code: Select all

. 1 . . 2 . . 3 .
4 . 5 . . . 6 . 7
. 7 . . . . . 8 .
. . . 6 . . . . .
2 . . . 5 . . . 9
. . . . . 8 . . .
. 4 . . . . . 1 .
1 . 6 . . . 5 . 8
. 3 . . 9 . . 7 .   ED=6.7/4.2/2.6

[g.r.emlin]

::: game 0159 status 2011-12-09+19:06:02-0000 :::

Code: Select all

game 0159 2011-12-07+10:00:00-0000 duration 2d09h dealer JPF pages 1149-1158 (open) 5 players
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    1.2/1.2/1.2 Patrice        4.2/4.2/2.6 m_b_metcalf    6.8/2.8/2.6 ronk           8.2/8.2/2.6 ronk
    1.5/1.5/1.5 ronk           4.4/4.4/2.6 ronk           6.9/1.5/1.5 m_b_metcalf    8.3/8.3/2.6 Patrice
    1.7/1.5/1.5 m_b_metcalf    4.5/4.5/2.6 ronk           7.0/4.2/2.6 ronk           8.4/8.4/2.6 Patrice
    2.0/2.0/2.0 Patrice        4.6/4.6/2.6 m_b_metcalf    7.1/7.1/3.4 Patrice        8.5/8.3/2.6 ronk
    2.3/2.3/2.3 Patrice        4.8/1.5/1.5 ronk           7.2/7.2/2.6 Patrice        8.6/8.6/2.6 gsf
    2.5/2.3/2.3 gsf            5.0/5.0/2.6 Patrice        7.3/7.3/2.6 Patrice        8.7/8.3/2.6 Patrice
    2.6/2.3/2.3 gsf            5.2/2.0/2.0 Patrice        7.4/7.4/2.6 Patrice        8.8/8.8/2.6 Patrice
    2.8/2.8/2.8 Patrice        5.6/4.2/2.6 Patrice        7.5/7.2/2.6 Patrice        8.9/8.9/2.6 Patrice
    3.0/3.0/2.6 Patrice        5.7/2.8/2.8 ronk           7.6/7.6/2.6 Patrice        9.0/9.0/2.6 m_b_metcalf
    3.2/2.8/2.6 gsf            6.1/1.5/1.5 gsf            7.7/7.7/2.6 Patrice        9.1/9.1/2.6 Patrice
    3.4/3.4/2.6 ronk           6.2/2.8/2.6 gsf            7.8/7.2/2.6 gsf            9.2/9.2/2.6 Patrice
    3.6/2.8/2.6 gsf            6.5/2.0/2.0 gsf            7.9/2.8/2.6 gsf            9.3/9.3/2.6 Patrice
    3.8/3.4/2.6 Patrice        6.6/6.6/2.6 Patrice        8.0/2.8/2.6 ronk           9.4/1.2/1.2 Patrice
    4.0/1.5/1.5 gsf            6.7/4.2/2.6 Patrice        8.1/1.2/1.2 ronk
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    open ratings : 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.4 5.8-6.0 9.5-11.4

       submitter  entries  score  response  notes
     -----------  -------  -----  --------  -----
             JPF        0      0         0  dealer
     m_b_metcalf        5    352    48m54s  rare-0,pearl*3,dup-puzzle-tie
            ronk       12   1142    42m21s  rare-0*2,rare-1*6,rare-2,pearl*4
             gsf       11   1523    42m35s  rare-0*12,rare-1*4,rare-2*5,pearl,lower-pearl
         Patrice       27   2526    29m33s  rare-2,diamond,pearl*16,highest-rating=438,last-entry=243,se-mismatch
     -----------  -------  -----            -----
               5       55   5543            rare-0*15,rare-1*10,rare-2*7,diamond,pearl*24


[ronk]

::: comment :::

if you look at the 2 adjustment post by gremlin, they refer to the same post

Oh, didn't notice there actually are two adjustment posts. In that case, I think the 2nd adjustment and not scoring the 8.5/8.5/2.6 submission might indeed be related. I'll PM g.r.emlin with my theory. [edit: Although there were two posts indicating an adjustment for the same submission, I believe an adjustment was not applied the 2nd time. Witness your line score reads "se-mismatch", not "se-mismatch*2", as in an earlier game here.]

BTW since you're leading this game and continuing to run up the score, I really don't understand why you're complaining about the refereeing. Should you happen to lose, just protest after the game is over.

[gsf]

Code: Select all

. 1 . . 2 . . 3 .
3 . 4 . . . 5 . 6
. 6 . . . . . 7 .
. . . 2 . . . . .
7 . . . 1 . . . 8
. . . . . 9 . . .
. 3 . . . . . 5 .
5 . 2 . . . 3 . 4
. 4 . . 9 . . 6 .  ED=6.9/2.0/2.0

[Patrice]

Code: Select all

. 1 . . 2 . . 3 .
4 . 2 . . . 1 . 5
. 5 . . . . . 6 .
. . . 1 . . . . .
6 . . . 7 . . . 8
. . . . . 3 . . .
. 4 . . . . . 5 .
2 . 5 . . . 7 . 4
. 3 . . 8 . . 9 .   ED=6.9/2.8/2.6

[gsf]

Code: Select all

. 1 . . 9 . . 3 .
3 . 4 . . . 5 . 6
. 5 . . . . . 4 .
. . . 6 . . . . .
7 . . . 4 . . . 2
. . . . . 8 . . .
. 3 . . . . . 7 .
9 . 2 . . . 3 . 4
. 6 . . 8 . . 9 .  ED=4.7/1.5/1.5