::: comment :::
champagne wrote:ronk wrote:I had in mind the 5.9/1.2/1.2 , "two submissions earlier" as I wrote. Just as for the 10.8/10.8/10.1, you would have won doing nothing.
I missed it, but I am surprised. unhappily, I have no record of the score at that time.
As I have in mind a very small differential after the 10.3 diamond, which is scored very high, I would be interested to see the position before the 5.9.
I don't have the position at that time either. I began saving the scores after my plays starting with my follow-up 6.2/3.4/3.4. At that time it was ...
- Code: Select all
submitter entries score response notes
----------- ------- ----- -------- -----
m_b_metcalf 8 825 49m36s rare-0*3,rare-1*2,diamond*5
joel64 16 1855 39m18s rare-0*3,rare-2,diamond*10,pearl*4
ronk 27 3171 2h09m rare-0,rare-2,diamond*21,pearl*3,last-entry=395,dealer
champagne 17 3203 32m25s rare-2*2,diamond*6,pearl*3,highest-rating=751
----------- ------- ----- -----
4 68 9054 rare-0*7,rare-1*2,rare-2*4,diamond*42,pearl*10
Since you seem to believe no one else besides yourself, you can work backwards from there.
champagne wrote:But as you'll see if nobody else comes, there was still some room in the 10.7 area for others.
A diversionary smokescreen that makes no difference that I can see. Anyone besides you could still have played a 10.7
after you played your 5.9. If anyone played a 10.7 first, you could then still play your 5.9. Only a handful of points difference either way.