Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Everything about Sudoku that doesn't fit in one of the other sections

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby coloin » Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:27 pm

Yes thats excellent coding ....if no DB need 13 clues it is probably academic for the 17-search as you possibly have searched and excluded all grids with bands requiring 6 clues .
champagne wrote:6 of the 416 bands have a minimum of 6 clues in band. (1;224;237;254;307;413 )
Any pair of these bands has a minimum number of clues of 12.
the best chance to pass 12 clues as minimum for 2 bands is with such a pair.....

I agree with that !
I'm a bit more optimistic now ....!

Previously published details on the 4 grids
Hidden Text: Show
Code: Select all
  1,  1,  1,224,224,224       0,     0,     0,     0,     0,     0       # 18                                 
  4,224,224,224,224,224     252,     0,     0,     0,     0,     0       #  6                                 
224,224,224,254,254,413       0,     0,     0,     0,     0,     0       #  6                                 
224,224,224,225,225,414       0,     0,     0,    90,    90,   324       #  2                                 
                                                                                                             
The bands that need 6 clues are  1,224,237,254,307,413                                                 

123456789456789123789123456214897365365214897897365214541632978632978541978541632 : blue1  puz20=0 puz21= 7488
123456789456789123789132465218967534564213978937548216391875642645321897872694351 : blue2  puz20=0 puz21= 3138
123456789457189326689327154216534897745891632938672541361245978574918263892763415 : blue3  puz20=0 puz21= 3894
123456789457189326689327154216534897745891632938672541392765418574918263861243975 : blue4  puz20=0 puz21=19682

Band numbers adjusted
Last edited by coloin on Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
coloin
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: 05 May 2005
Location: Devon

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby champagne » Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:49 pm

coloin wrote:
Previously published details on the 4 grids
224,224,224,254,254,413 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 # 6
224,224,224,225,225,414 0, 0, 0, 90, 90, 324 # 2
123456789457189326689327154216534897745891632938672541361245978574918263892763415 : blue3 puz20=0 puz21= 3894
123456789457189326689327154216534897745891632938672541392765418574918263861243975 : blue4 puz20=0 puz21=19682



Sorry first for all the trouble in the band Id .; Working on index, I have from time to time to adjust the number by +-1. I'll did it badly. I'll adjust the posts.

I was interested in checking the band "224" having the lowest count of "6 clues".

162 *162 remains a big number. I have less valids out of these 162*162 , but still 576 about 2/100 of the raw count
Last edited by champagne on Sun Jan 23, 2022 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
champagne
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 7456
Joined: 02 August 2007
Location: France Brittany

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby coloin » Sun Jan 23, 2022 9:41 am

Yes they are all big numbers .....
I an getting pessimistic to find a DB13 now, although it wouldn't be feasible to check all the potential DB.....
eg all 15 band pairs from (1;224;237;254;307;413 ) :!:
coloin
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: 05 May 2005
Location: Devon

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby champagne » Sun Jan 23, 2022 10:06 am

coloin wrote:Yes they are all big numbers .....
I an getting pessimistic to find a DB13 now, although it wouldn't be feasible to check all the potential DB.....
eg all 15 band pairs from (1;224;237;254;307;413 ) :!:


Yes, in theory it's not to hard, assuming that the 13 is not in another pair (a much lower probability)
I have the code to produce all ED pairs, just missing time and cores to do it.
The number of pairs containing only the six bands is not that big,

BTW, the 900 million pairs have a minimum number of clues in the range 8-12. (forgetting the case 7) and likely a small number of pairs requiring 12 clues.
the pic must be in 9-10 with hundred millions of pairs
champagne
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 7456
Joined: 02 August 2007
Location: France Brittany

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby coloin » Sun Jan 23, 2022 4:25 pm

I think you have a good appreciation of the task - there is almost certainly DB which require at least 8 [4+4] clues but actually need 9.

983 Million DB ... how many pairs both with 6 clues needed.....

416 x 415 / 2 combinations = 86,320 pairs each equally likely perhaps [?] and we have 15 pairs both with 6 clues required

983 M * 15 / 86,300 = 170,000 pairs

MCN 16 grids might also be a good place to look .... but they may well be included in above ?
-
mathimagics wrote: Another interesting thing about the grids is that only 187 (of the 222,278 found) have non-trivial automorphisms.

from this clever thread no grids with mcn >16

Addendum ... maybe its just not possible to put 13 UAs in 54 clues [cf the above thread] . Certainly not possible to put 13 disjoint U4s :oops:.
coloin
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: 05 May 2005
Location: Devon

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby champagne » Sun Jan 23, 2022 10:27 pm

coloin wrote:I think you have a good appreciation of the task - there is almost certainly DB which require at least 8 [4+4] clues but actually need 9.

983 Million DB ... how many pairs both with 6 clues needed.....

416 x 415 / 2 combinations = 86,320 pairs each equally likely perhaps [?] and we have 15 pairs both with 6 clues required

983 M * 15 / 86,300 = 170,000 pairs


Hi coloin,

The rough count is likely correct.
As I wrote in another post, if we just consider ED pairs, the total is closer to 620 millions pairs.

Anyway, I have the code to produce any of the options. I have just to clean the inline producer of the bands for the search 17.

this could be done in "say" one week if I put it on the top of the to do file.

Champagne
champagne
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 7456
Joined: 02 August 2007
Location: France Brittany

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby champagne » Sun Jan 23, 2022 10:34 pm

coloin wrote:Addendum ... maybe its just not possible to put 13 UAs in 54 clues [cf the above thread] . Certainly not possible to put 13 disjoint U4s :oops:.


13 disjoint uas minimum 4x13=52 surely not possible.

13 UAs in 54 clues: I work with hundreds sometimes more than 1000 uas depending on the pair, this with a strict limitation in the UAs size (around 20 clues at maximum). Could you tell more about this

Note : the band set of UAs to get all valid one band solutions can reach 81 UAs (from memory) this is for band 29. Generally, the set of UAs for one band is around 30
champagne
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 7456
Joined: 02 August 2007
Location: France Brittany

Re: Minimum clues in a double band [DB]

Postby coloin » Sun Jan 23, 2022 11:09 pm

champagne wrote:....
In the 17 search, we are considering ED bands 12 "minimal against the diagonal view"
This reduces the number of minimal in my case to 610 163 364 but using the 983,959,110 ED double bands would not be a problem....
"
Yes I didn't quite understand the .... " minimal against the diagonal view" .... but finally the penny dropped !!!
It must mean a diagonal reflection in a DB - which maintains equivalence - but the transformation is difficult to visualise !
I think that is a new one for most of us ... but well worth it !!!!

But maybe there is a bar set at 12 - [or it just doesn't exist] which might explain why you haven't found one in the more likely grids
[there is only theoretical space for 12 disjoint U4s in a double band - as there can only be 4 pairs per box][one spare clue per box]
But there are many non disjoint UAs which maybe just don't succumb to our 12 clues - especially with the bigger UAs which we never know about
and there are many possible band pairs for it to happen...

As with many things we try to achieve.... it is because its difficult that we try...
Proving something is impossible is just as valid as finding a needle in a haystack
coloin
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: 05 May 2005
Location: Devon

Re: Minimum clues in a double band [DB]

Postby champagne » Sun Jan 23, 2022 11:41 pm

coloin wrote:
champagne wrote:....
In the 17 search, we are considering ED bands 12 "minimal against the diagonal view"
This reduces the number of minimal in my case to 610 163 364 but using the 983,959,110 ED double bands would not be a problem....
"
Yes I didn't quite understand the .... " minimal against the diagonal view" .... but finally the penny dropped !!!
It must mean a diagonal reflection in a DB - which maintains equivalence - but the transformation is difficult to visualise !
I think that is a new one for most of us ... but well worth it !!!!



Sorry if I did not explain it in the right way.
And I am not so sure that we don't have to use the 983,959,110 ED double bands in your exercise.

In the 17 search, we want to avoid redundancy, so, to make it simple, we process the 5 472 730 538 ED solution grids.
To catch these ED solution grids, we don't process bands having a lower morph in the canonicalization process. 90° rotation or main diagonal symmetry must be used to cover all morphs
Thinking a little more about that, I think that you would like to have all pairs, not only pairs relevant in the catalog of ED solution grids.
champagne
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 7456
Joined: 02 August 2007
Location: France Brittany

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby champagne » Mon Jan 24, 2022 6:56 am

hi coloin,
more about the bands requiring 6 clues.

In my 17 search, these bands have index 0 to 5. The reason is that the bands 1 are ordered to have the lowest count of valid 6 clues (as in mladen table) in the solution grid.

These six bands ordered 224, 237, 1, 413, 254, 307 have auto morphs respectively 5,1,107,35,5,5.
If as I think, the average auto morph is somewhere between 1 and 2, we should find less than average pairs.

to give an idea, in this area, a band 1 has more than 5Million bands 2 attached in the process with no auto morph.
band 1 (index2) has only 52 561
band 224 (index 0) 912 650 (5 auto morphs)
band 224(index 1) 2 680 806 (1 auto morph)

The number of pairs out of the 983,959,110 ED double bands could be below 100 000.
champagne
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 7456
Joined: 02 August 2007
Location: France Brittany

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby coloin » Mon Jan 24, 2022 12:58 pm

Ok ...thats good they all need 12 clues ... and each DB expands to give approx 40 ED solution grids ...

maybe in those 100K DB ... there will be those which have a "ganster44reverse" pattern which isnt solvable in 6 clues ......

there are only 44 "gangster44reverse equivalents" or DBgangsters perhaps is better

this one produced fortuitously - from earlier post
Code: Select all
...........................123456789456789123789123456214897365365214897897365214   - none are solvable with 5

this might well be the only one of the 44 which isnt solvable in 5 / which needs 6 clues

All solutions of those DB which have that DB gangster all need 18C

but maybe those grids will just be combinations of our 6 bands (1;224;237/254;307;413) - and they are already excluded from your 17C search no doubt

Or maybe eg (1;224;237/xxx;yyy;zzz) (horizontal 3 / vertical 3) for example ..... that would be good because those solution grids could be excluded from your 17C search
coloin
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: 05 May 2005
Location: Devon

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby champagne » Mon Jan 24, 2022 1:45 pm

coloin wrote:Ok ...thats good they all need 12 clues ... and each DB expands to give approx 40 ED solution grids ...

maybe in those 100K DB ... there will be those which have a "ganster44reverse" pattern which isnt solvable in 6 clues ......

there are only 44 "gangster44reverse equivalents" or DBgangsters perhaps is better

Hi coloin

if I got your point, this should be a 17 distribution 6+6+5

here is the list of known for the corresponding band 1 6 clues

.23.........1....6.9..7........9....5....2...8......71.4.....9.....3.2.....6.....;1;63;354;5
.23.........1....6.9..7........9....5...2....8......51.4.....9.....3.2.....5.....;1;137;330;5
1.......9...7...2..8...3..........7.5....1...6...9...8...............5.1.726.....;2;180;340;5
12...6...........3......45..9.5.......7.....1...34....3............97..2..5......;2;204;292;5
12..........78...3..9......5...4.9..6....1...........8.......1....8.2....7.....6.;2;206;209;5
1...5......6....2......34.......7.6.39...8...5..............3....126............8;2;231;410;5
1...5......6....2......34.........6734...8...9.......................3.8..126....;2;294;347;5
1...........8..6.2.9...7...2.8......6............34.7....21..5..4.....3..........;3;329;372;5
.234...........6.........512...1.........89...4.....3.............3...4.8.5..1...;4;31;370;5
12...........8.6.3...7.......8....7...4.3.........2.1......1...........8.46..5...;4;320;334;5
1....6.8...7.....3....2....26...1......9..5.7...........57......3.....6.....9....;5;23;52;5
12...6...............3..45..1......6..45...7.....9......5....9......1..27........;5;122;318;5
12...6...............3..45...45......6..9...2.......7......2..6..5....9.7........;5;160;318;5
..3.....9...1...2..8...7......5......126...........3.5....9.8..6......1......3...;5;172;343;5


here index 0-5 as first band
none of them has the second band with an index 0-5
champagne
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 7456
Joined: 02 August 2007
Location: France Brittany

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby coloin » Mon Jan 24, 2022 4:55 pm

maybe this explains .....

but maybe you knew this already !!!!!

Code: Select all
123456789457893612896127345634289157578631924219574863761345298942768531385912476 # {413 168 168  , 238 125 126}
 

:!: This grid solution cant have a 17

Edited to another grid.
Program index416 attributes different band numbers. Band numbers needing 6 clues are { 1,132,145,168,202,413}
This grid has 3 bands which needs 6 clues. However minlexing it will hide it in the mix.
Last edited by coloin on Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
coloin
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: 05 May 2005
Location: Devon

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby champagne » Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:34 pm

coloin wrote:maybe this explains .....

but maybe you knew this already !!!!!

Code: Select all
513624789984715326276389154425136897791458632638297541142563978857941263369872415    193 289 284  , 307 307 413

:!: This grid solution cant have a 17

I don't know why :D
but as you got it, from the list above where we have no 5,5 I agree, it can not have one.
champagne
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 7456
Joined: 02 August 2007
Location: France Brittany

Re: Low/Hi Clue Thresholds

Postby coloin » Mon Jan 24, 2022 6:01 pm

32 more solution grids which cant have a 17 ... and most lost in the minlexing

Hidden Text: Show
Code: Select all
123456789457893612896127345274689153638571924519234867761945238942368571385712496'413 202 202  , 316 399 344
123456789457893612896127345274689153638571924519234867961745238742368591385912476'413 202 202  , 382 180 305
123456789457893612896127345268319457714568923539274861971645238685932174342781596'413 202 202  , 275 234 361
123456789457893612896127345268319457714568923539274861972645138685931274341782596'413 202 202  ,  79 395  89
123456789457893612896127345234689157678531924519274863761345298985712436342968571'413 202 202  , 150 398  56
123456789457893612896127345274689153638571924519234867761345298985712436342968571'413 202 202  , 260 409  57
123456789457893612896127345234689157678531924519274863361945278942768531785312496'413 202 202  ,  49 372 354
123456789457893612896127345234689157678531924519274863961345278342768591785912436'413 202 202  , 377 397 107
123456789457893612896127345274689153638571924519234867361945278942768531785312496'413 202 202  , 260 401 364
123456789457893612896127345274689153638571924519234867961345278342768591785912436'413 202 202  , 408 397 118
123456789457893612896127345631278954574619823289534167742361598968745231315982476'413 202 202  , 395 235 149
123456789457893612896127345631278954574619823289534167745361298968742531312985476'413 202 202  , 407 374 269
123456789457893612896127345671238954534619827289574163742361598968745231315982476'413 202 202  , 396 366  65
123456789457893612896127345671238954534619827289574163745361298968742531312985476'413 202 202  , 412 303  50
123456789457893612896127345714268953568319427239574861971645238685932174342781596'413 202 202  , 342 200 304
123456789457893612896127345714268953568319427239574861972645138685931274341782596'413 202 202  , 129 409 282
123456789457893612896127345342689157678512934519374268231945876964738521785261493'413 202 202  , 382 225 216
123456789457893612896127345342689157678512934519374268931245876264738591785961423'413 202 202  , 408 194 235
123456789457893612896127345542689137678312954319574268231945876964738521785261493'413 202 202  , 192 338  50
123456789457893612896127345542689137678312954319574268931245876264738591785961423'413 202 202  , 192 403 264
123456789457893612896127345238569471574318926619274853961745238785932164342681597'413 202 202  , 395  93 248
123456789457893612896127345238569471574318926619274853962745138785931264341682597'413 202 202  , 299 291 317
123456789457893612896127345238579461564318927719264853971645238685932174342781596'413 202 202  , 392  77 156
123456789457893612896127345238579461564318927719264853972645138685931274341782596'413 202 202  , 228 386 120
123456789457893612896127345238569471574318926619274853741935268962781534385642197'413 202 202  , 385 193 333
123456789457893612896127345238569471574318926619274853742935168961782534385641297'413 202 202  , 409 323  75
123456789457893612896127345268579431534618927719234856971345268642781593385962174'413 202 202  , 410 126 237
123456789457893612896127345268579431534618927719234856972345168641782593385961274'413 202 202  , 354 354  46
123456789457893612896127345245689137678315924319274568531942876964738251782561493'413 202 202  , 208 341 120
123456789457893612896127345245689137678315924319274568782561493964738251531942876'413 202 202  , 208 341 120
123456789457893612896127345245689137678315924319274568782961453564738291931542876'413 202 202  , 342 171 155
123456789457893612896127345245689137678315924319274568931542876564738291782961453'413 202 202  , 342 171 155
Last edited by coloin on Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
coloin
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: 05 May 2005
Location: Devon

PreviousNext

Return to General