by Karyobin » Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:54 pm
Then going out on a limb, I'd say there's nothing wrong with your thinking at all. I entirely agree that there should be a possible '1' in r9c9 and furthermore if this is the first example in the book, I'd return it. Although accepting that they probably don't have any obligation to take it back, it's probably worth telling the publishers and seeing what their offer is.
Having said that, it's possible there's an obvious thing that we're both missing, so don't take my word for it just yet.