Serg wrote:Hi,
dobrichev!
dobrichev wrote:337+3 = 340
- Code: Select all
........1..2.13.4.14..56237.1..75.82.8.3..1..2.5.81374.2..3...84...687238....74..
........1.12.34....3561.247..7.8..6..2.4....8.58.6.472.731..8.4.81.437262..8...1.
........1.12.34....356.1247..7..8.6..2.4....8.58..6472.731..8.4.81.437262..8...1.
There are no new fatties within the {-4+4} vicinity.
The newcomers live on its own {-4+4} island.
Congratulations with new found 39-clue minimal puzzles! Well done!
What is your method of search?
Serg
Thank you,
Serg.
Nothing special in my method. I found that the vicinity search algorithm I used for hard puzzles more than one year ago, performs very well on high-clue puzzles. {-4+1,2,3,4} search on a single 39-clue puzzle executes for about 400 to 800 seconds on a regular PC.
I closed the existing 39s with no new discoveries but with some distant 38-clue stuff.
- Code: Select all
Clues puzzles
36 22306
37 16680
38 2626
39 337
I searched {-3+4} around the 38s and found the second and the third puzzles in the list. The first arose latter at < {-4+4} to the other two.
In the next days I'll try moving a bit farther.
Lars Petter Endresen, one of the players in
Havard's team that discovered the first 39-clue puzzle, motivated me to do in this exercise.
(Motivation has nothing in common with the discussed above publication)