here.
A number of example grids were cited in that post (in hidden text) all having the property that they contained one or more row/column-based conjugate pairs (box-based pairs don't apply). It was then also noted in all of those grids that each EE cell was always a peer of at least one of the conjugate-pair candidates in that grid.
A more recent review of additional sample grids in the UFG and elsewhere has revealed the same property, including some grids having multiple EE cells, such as the grid below from Obi-Wahn's arithmetic post. The conjugate pairs of interest here are r12c1 and r17c8:
- Code: Select all
2 . . | . . -2 | . *2 2
2 . . | 2 -2 . | . . 2
. . . | . *2 *2 | *2 . .
---------+----------+----------
. . . | . . *2 | #2 . .
. . 2 | 2 . . | 2 . .
. . 2 | 2 . . | . . 2
---------+----------+----------
. . . | 2 . . | -2 *2 .
. . . | . *2 *2 | *2 . *2
. . . | . . . | . . .
jellyfish r348c8\c56b39 plus remote fin r4c7, implies r1c6<>2, r2c5<>2 and r7c7<>2
Even with all these examples, a proof seems elusive, at least for me!
Any takers?