quixote wrote:Have you EVER visited a shop in a Third World market? Inside such a shop, you will find a lot of bargains with famous brand names from France, Italy, Britain and America. But if you are the type who shops and shops until you drop, it will not be able to escape from your expert eyes that most of the so-called famous brands are fakes.
The same goes with Pyrrhon's website or "Wiedemann's shop". Although most of them are stamped with famous labels like "Sudoku X" and "Navigator Sudoku", they are not created by the hands of the original inventors. The uninitiated will get the impression that they have gotten the real things since they are attached with copyrights without permission and without crediting the sources.
What you think you can get free from "Wiedemann's shop", you might as well go to the original shops to get the real goods. Unlike the high-class watches, electronic goods, leather shoes and bags, you can also get them free from the original source. If you also want to set up a shop to start business like Wiedemann, you can also get the real puzzles from the original websites provided you have the civilised courtesy of the First World to ask for permission first and credit the original sources.
I'm not aware that the "original inventors" of those puzzles have obtained the patents/copyright for the format... Can you provide solid legal evidence that they have done so to support you arguments? Is the format of Sudoku copyrighted? And for Killer Sudoku/Sudoku X/Consecutive Sudoku etc. (I mean the puzzle concepts not the mere names)? If they're then the thousands/millions of members from this forum and other forums have been breaking the laws for ages! And why would you want to single out Mr. Wiedemann out now?
And to claim someone's puzzles being "fake" is a serious accusation.
As far as I know he designed the layouts of the clues by himself and didn't nick it from another site. Most of the puzzles are valid puzzles with unique solutions, and the invalid ones are quickly replaced/removed. Some of the pics could be not too attractive, but as intellectuals we're interested in the concept not the physical appearance... I don't see what makes the puzzles "fake" just because the formats aren't invented by him...
A Chinese market shop selling "fake" Louis Vuitton handbags made of cheap pig leather is a crime. They do it to earn money (illegally). People buy them (who are aware they're fake) because they can't afford the real thing. People who aren't aware they're fake and paying money thinking they're the real things are being conned. It's immoral and the owners of the "real brands" lose profit because of that.
The situation is so different here for any analogy. Pyrrhon didn't ask you any money for his puzzles. The original inventors of the formats didn't ask us to pay for theirs either (according to you), so it's not like they're getting ripped off (financially). There is no financial conflict.
The reason he attached the copyright thingy is (I guess) because somebody else is directly linking his images for profit etc, and he's getting ripped off for both his time/effort to produce those images and the bandwidth load of his website. I'm not 100% sure but that's mostly the case why people attach copyright lines on images they create. I think most intellectual puzzlers realise that the copyright applies directly to the image and not the general format of the puzzles. Anyhow I don't see Pyrrhon getting any profit maliciously from that copyright tag...
Puzzle creators like Pyrrhon/Ruud/Djape and many unherald souls here provide free puzzles using their own time/bandwidth to give us entertainment and opportunities to exercise our intelligence... I think it's an utterly ungrateful act to complain about the difficulties/qualities of their puzzles or accusing them of unlawful offences without any solid legal evidence...