Red Ed wrote:(maximum in fact) rather than the usual minimal form. This seems the most natural way of doing things for pseudo-puzzles, since by leaving only the variable cells exposed you can see how much space is left in the grid for the remaining unclued unavoidables.
Of course that is better........I was only thinking of the way I was searching - It still is possible to get mutable puzzles [to coincide] with 24-26 clue minimal and non minimal puzzles.
How are you doing it ?
Red Ed wrote:For the purposes of chasing highly-mutable cells, I regard two pseudo-puzzles that have the same solution grids as being equivalent.
you mean like these two JPF mentioned from earlier.......Is this a common occurance ?
- Code: Select all
+---+---+---+
|1..|.5.|...|
|...|3..|.6.|
|..8|...|2..|
+---+---+---+
|.3.|..2|...|
|9..|.*.|..5|
|...|6..|.7.|
+---+---+---+
|..5|...|1..|
|.6.|..7|...|
|...|.9.|..8|
+---+---+---+
+---+---+---+
|123|456|789|
|7..|328|.61|
|6.8|.7.|2.3|
+---+---+---+
|.37|..2|.16|
|9.6|7*.|325|
|.12|63.|.74|
+---+---+---+
|..5|263|1.7|
|36.|8.7|..2|
|27.|.9.|638|
+---+---+---+ * = 1 or 8,equivalent solution grid!
RedEd wrote:(But if you're considering the mutability of several cells, e.g. looking for chameleons, then of course the maximal form I've been using isn't helpful.)
We found the chameleons in high clue [34] minimal puzzles - because there were so many clues - a few of the puzzles turned out to be chameleons........pure luck......
One could generate millions of minimal 33s and 32s [from the 35s and 34s we have] and possibly there might be a chameleon amonst them....