Twin-4 easy or not?

For fans of Killer Sudoku, Samurai Sudoku and other variants

Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby Hajime » Thu Dec 19, 2024 7:25 pm

This is a Twin-4; 2 vanilla Sudoku's with 4 overlapping boxes
Code: Select all
                                                   
+-----------+-----------+-----------+               
| 2   9     | 3   1     |           |               
|         1 |         6 |           |               
| 3       4 |           |           |               
+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+   
| 5         |     6     | 2         |           |   
|           |           |     6     |           |   
| 9   4     |     5     |           |         6 |   
+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+   
| 8         |           |           |           |   
|           | 8         |           |           |   
|           |         9 |         2 | 3         |   
+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+   
            | 3       2 |           |     1     |   
            |           |     7   8 | 4       2 |   
            |         4 | 1         |     6     |   
            +-----------+-----------+-----------+   

#2//B4/E10
29.31......1..6...3.4......5...6.2.........6.94..5....8...........8..........9..2
.6.2.........6.....5......6.........8..........9..23..3.2....1.....784.2..41...6.
Is this difficult to solve or easy and why?
User avatar
Hajime
 
Posts: 1385
Joined: 20 April 2018
Location: Fryslân

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby urhegyi » Fri Dec 20, 2024 9:14 am

Making use of the rules defined by the overlapping boxes it's easy, without it it's difficult.
urhegyi
 
Posts: 755
Joined: 13 April 2020

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby m_b_metcalf » Fri Dec 20, 2024 9:15 am

Hajime wrote:Is this difficult to solve or easy and why?

I'd guess the SE rating to be in the range 6 to 8:
Code: Select all
  2  9  5  3  1  4  6  7  8         
  7  8  1  5  9  6  3  2  4           
  3  6  4  7  8  2  1  9  5           
  5  3  8  1  6  7  2  4  9  5  3  8 
  1  7  2  9  4  8  5  6  3  2  7  1 
  9  4  6  2  5  3  7  8  1  9  4  6 
  8  1  7  4  2  5  9  3  6  1  8  7 
  6  2  9  8  3  1  4  5  7  6  2  9 
  4  5  3  6  7  9  8  1  2  3  5  4 
           3  8  2  6  9  4  7  1  5
           5  1  6  3  7  8  4  9  2
           7  9  4  1  2  5  8  6  3


Mike
User avatar
m_b_metcalf
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 13637
Joined: 15 May 2006
Location: Berlin

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby m_b_metcalf » Fri Dec 20, 2024 1:36 pm

Using x-sudokus you can get the overlap area to be empty:
Code: Select all
 . 3 7 . 8 . . 9 .
 8 . . 5 2 . . . .
 . . . 9 . 7 . . .
 . . 4 . . . . . . 4 6 .
 . . 2 . . . . . . . . 2
 . . 8 . . . . . . . . .
 . . . . . . . . . . . .
 . . . . . . . . . . 8 6
 . . . . . . . . . . . .
       . 3 . . 1 . . . .
       . . . . 8 6 3 . .
       4 . . 3 . . . 5 .

 Number of clues  25 

.37.8..9.8..52.......9.7.....4........2........8.................................
......46.........2.........................86..........3..1........863..4..3...5.


Mike
User avatar
m_b_metcalf
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 13637
Joined: 15 May 2006
Location: Berlin

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby Hajime » Fri Dec 20, 2024 2:30 pm

urhegyi wrote:
rules defined by the overlapping boxes

Do you have a link for these methods?

In a next version of SiSeSuSo a new method for overlapping multiple Sudokus is implemented. I don't know the name, will soon describe it.
Without it, the above puzzle needs guessing like forcing chains or nets, indeed SE>6 like Mike said. But with it, it is like pointing/claiming.
User avatar
Hajime
 
Posts: 1385
Joined: 20 April 2018
Location: Fryslân

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby Hajime » Fri Dec 20, 2024 3:22 pm

m_b_metcalf wrote:Using x-sudokus you can get the overlap area to be empty

Yes, without x-sudokus (just plain vanilla) I could not find a puzzle with the overlap area to be empty.
User avatar
Hajime
 
Posts: 1385
Joined: 20 April 2018
Location: Fryslân

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby m_b_metcalf » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:04 pm

Hajime wrote:Yes, without x-sudokus (just plain vanilla) I could not find a puzzle with the overlap area to be empty.

My best result was 3 clues in the overlap region:
Code: Select all
 . . 3 . . . . . 8
 . 9 . . 5 4 . . .
 . 4 8 . 1 . . . .
 . 8 7 . . . . . . . . 9
 . . . . 7 . 3 . . . . .
 . 5 . . . . . . . 2 . .
 . . 4 . . . . . . . . .
 . . . . . . . . . 9 . .
 . . . 2 . . . . . 6 7 .
       . . . . . . . . .
       . . 2 7 . 3 . . .
       . . 9 . 6 2 . . 8

 Number of clues  27 

..3.....8.9..54....48.1.....87..........7.3...5.........4..................2.....
........9.7.3...........2.................9..2.....67............27.3.....9.62..8


Mike
User avatar
m_b_metcalf
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 13637
Joined: 15 May 2006
Location: Berlin

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby blue » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:55 pm

m_b_metcalf wrote:
Hajime wrote:Yes, without x-sudokus (just plain vanilla) I could not find a puzzle with the overlap area to be empty.

My best result was 3 clues in the overlap region

Shapes like this, in the overlap region, always contain an unavoidable set.

Code: Select all
+-------+-------+
| . . . | x x x |
| . . . | x x x |
| . . . | x x x |
+-------+-------+
| x x x | x x x |
| x x x | x x x |
| x x x | x x x |
+-------+-------+

You need at least two clues to hit all 4 shapes.
Two clues is possible.

Code: Select all
3 6 2 7 8 4 9 5 1
8 9 4 5 1 3 2 6 7
7 1 5 2 9 6 4 8 3
1 8 9 . . . . . . 9 1 8
2 3 7 . . . . . . 7 3 2
4 5 6 . . 7 . . . 4 6 5
9 2 8 . . . 1 . . 8 2 9
6 4 1 . . . . . . 1 4 6
5 7 3 . . . . . . 5 7 3
      7 9 4 2 8 3 6 5 1
      2 1 6 9 5 7 3 8 4
      5 8 3 4 6 1 2 9 7

362784951894513267715296483189......237......456..7...928...1..641......573......
......918......732..7...465...1..829......146......573794283651216957384583461297
blue
 
Posts: 1052
Joined: 11 March 2013

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby blue » Fri Dec 20, 2024 9:10 pm

Hajime wrote:In a next version of SiSeSuSo a new method for overlapping multiple Sudokus is implemented. I don't know the name, will soon describe it.
Without it, the above puzzle needs guessing like forcing chains or nets, indeed SE>6 like Mike said. But with it, it is like pointing/claiming.

State and after singles & "normal" locked candidates.

Code: Select all
+-----------------+------------------+------------------------+
| 2    9     58   | 3     1     4    | 56      7      568     |
| 7    58    1    | 59    89    6    | 3459    2      34589   |
| 3    6     4    | 579   789   2    | 1       59     589     |
+-----------------+------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
| 5    378   378  | 1479  6     1378 | 2       3489   3479    | 578      3578   3578   |
| 1    2378  2378 | 479   3479  378  | 345789  6      34579   | 1278     2378   1378   |
| 9    4     6    | 2     5     378  | 378     138    137     | 9        4      6      |
+-----------------+------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
| 8    1257  2579 | 1467  2347  1357 | 345679  13459  1345679 | 12578-6  25789  145789 |
| 46   1257  2579 | 8     2347  1357 | 345679  13459  1345679 | 12567    2579   14579  |
| 4-6  1357  357  | 1467  47    9    | 45678   1458   2       | 3        57     1457   |
+-----------------+------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
                  | 3     789   2    | 4569    59-4   4569    | 578      1      5789   |
                  | 59    1     6    | 359     7      8       | 4        359    2      |
                  | 579   789   4    | 1       2      359     | 578      6      35789  |
                  +------------------+------------------------+------------------------+

I'm guessing that the (3) eliminations that are shown, are the kind that you're talking about.
They (do) reduce the PM to being solvable with singles & "normal" locked candidates.
blue
 
Posts: 1052
Joined: 11 March 2013

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby Hajime » Sat Dec 21, 2024 9:01 am

Yes blue. That is the idea.
Let AAABBBBBBCCC be a row of the puzzel with AAA only in grid 1 and CCC in grid 2.
BBBBBB is in the overlapping part.

All clues in AAA must be in CCC and visa versa.
And candidates not in AAA can not be in CCC.

Your 3 cells have that characteristic.
Also g2r4c9 <> 4

Has this method a name?
User avatar
Hajime
 
Posts: 1385
Joined: 20 April 2018
Location: Fryslân

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby m_b_metcalf » Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:01 am

Hajime wrote:Has this method a name?

action-at-a-distance?

Mike
User avatar
m_b_metcalf
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 13637
Joined: 15 May 2006
Location: Berlin

Re: Twin-4 easy or not?

Postby blue » Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:20 am

Hajime wrote:Yes blue. That is the idea.
Let AAABBBBBBCCC be a row of the puzzel with AAA only in grid 1 and CCC in grid 2.
BBBBBB is in the overlapping part.

All clues in AAA must be in CCC and visa versa.
And candidates not in AAA can not be in CCC.

Has this method a name?

They seem like (more or less) standard "locked candidate" eliminations to me.
If a candidate doesn't appear in AAA, then it's locked in BBBBBB in the AAABBBBBB row (from grid 1), and in the BBBBBBCCC row (from grid 2), it can be eliminated from CCC.
blue
 
Posts: 1052
Joined: 11 March 2013


Return to Sudoku variants