Triangle cutting problem

Anything goes, but keep it seemly...

Postby udosuk » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:34 pm

Great job mates (particularly Ruud)!:)

I got 18, so 2 more for you guys & gals to discover...

But there could be more that I haven't realised...

Anyway you could try to list out the "area ratio" of each configuration, e.g.: 1,1,1,1 or 1,3,12,48...
udosuk
 
Posts: 2698
Joined: 17 July 2005

Postby emm » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:19 pm

Edit : Asked and answered my own question.
emm
 
Posts: 987
Joined: 02 July 2005

Postby Ruud » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:54 pm

OK thanks, nice to know the target. 17:!:

Image

One more to go:D

Ruud.
Ruud
 
Posts: 664
Joined: 28 October 2005

Postby udosuk » Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:18 pm

Is anybody still looking for the eluding #18?:?:

Tell me when you would like me to reveal my answer...
udosuk
 
Posts: 2698
Joined: 17 July 2005

Postby ab » Sun Apr 30, 2006 3:22 pm

I've spent ages looking at the 17 found so far for inspiration. I'd be happy if you'd put me outta my misery.

Great problem BTW
ab
 
Posts: 451
Joined: 06 September 2005

Postby udosuk » Sun Apr 30, 2006 3:38 pm

The truth is, you probably could not find any significant inspiration by merely looking at the previous 17 configurations... But #17 (from Ruud) could give some slight glimpse of hope, especially if you can guess how Ruud came up with that...

In fact I thought Ruud could have nailed it when he found #17 since #17 & #18 are normally found together...

Anyway I'll wait one more day and preferably with Ruud's formal approval to show the final one out... Or if somebody can work it out from my hints above...
udosuk
 
Posts: 2698
Joined: 17 July 2005

Postby ronk » Sun Apr 30, 2006 9:25 pm

Image
#18:?:
ronk
2012 Supporter
 
Posts: 4764
Joined: 02 November 2005
Location: Southeastern USA

Postby udosuk » Mon May 01, 2006 3:18 am

That's it. Well done ronk.:D

I doubt a #19 exists...:?:
udosuk
 
Posts: 2698
Joined: 17 July 2005

Postby udosuk » Mon May 01, 2006 9:06 am

Some graphics done by me...

Bi-cutting 3,4,9
#01: 9,12,16,27
#02: 3,9,16,36
#03: 1,3,3,9 (a)

Bi-cutting 1,3,12
#03: 1,3,3,9 (a) (duplicated)
#04: 3,4,9,48
#05: 1,3,12,48
Image


Bi-cutting 1,1,1
#06: 1,3,4,4 (a)
#07: 1,3,4,4 (b)
#08: 1,3,4,4 (c)

Tri-cutting 1,3
#09: 1,1,1,1 (a)
#10: 1,1,1,9
Image


Flipping rectangle of 1,3,3,9 (a)
#11: 1,3,3,9 (b)
Image


Rotating equilateral triangle of 1,1,1,1 (a)
#12: 1,1,1,1 (b)
#13: 1,1,1,1 (c)

Flipping rectangle of 1,1,1,1 (b)
#14: 1,1,1,1 (d)
Image


Tri-cutting 30-30-120 triangle of 1,2
#15: 1,1,3,4 (a)
#16: 1,1,3,4 (b)
Image


triangle within triangles
#17: 1,4,4,16
#18: 9,12,12,16
Image
Image

I deliberately tried to make good approximation to the 30-60-90 triangles...
I regarded 15-26-30 as the best "unit" side ratio...
udosuk
 
Posts: 2698
Joined: 17 July 2005

Postby underquark » Mon May 01, 2006 9:41 pm

If that's it for 4 (and it certainly looks and "feels" right) then what about 5? Once that is answered it ought to possible to conjecture a series or proof for 6, 7, 8 etc.
underquark
 
Posts: 299
Joined: 06 September 2005

Previous

Return to Coffee bar