Pat wrote:the 1st example does need a trio ( which qualifies it as "superior" )
.
.
.
i get a headache trying to follow all the possible solution-paths,
was hoping for software to do that---
It needs something out of (H3 T3 X2) to solve, what is required changes with each solution path though. If no technique is consistantly present in each solution path then you can't label it as needing a certain technique but you can safely say that it is "superior" because there will be alway a superior technique needed regardless of the puzzle configuration and method ordering or batching
I tried to use the -J in gsf's solver (i couldn't fit things into a single line).... so single input to multiple output files was done.
the 1st again failed to show a consistant technique ....so 0 for everything
the second showed X2x1 and H3x1 (absolute) & 0 for DUOs
To me this reflects the quality of the puzzles.
The superior 1st collection is of high quality. (as is the 2nd puzzle)
The superior 2nd collection is even better (because each non-single move is identically reproduced no matter who or how)
tarek