eleven wrote:Champagne,
because this puzzle has a pattern different to the known hardest, i would be interested, how you classify it (ER is 11.5):
- Code: Select all
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 3 | . . 6 | . 8 . |
| . . . | 1 . . | 2 . 6 |
| 6 . . | . 7 . | . . 5 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 4 | . . . | . . . |
| 3 . . | . . 4 | . 9 . |
| . 9 8 | . 2 . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 3 . | . . 8 | . 6 . |
| 8 . . | . . . | 1 . 7 |
| . . . | 5 . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
I checked your puzzle and I made a run including the former 11.8
009000400070300020800060007100800006000010070000056000300005001040000090002000700 11.8
003006080000100206600070005004000000300004090098020000030008060800000107000500000 11.5
My first run is done excluding all special tools (symmetry, SK loop, EXOXET, R0 logic)
The 2 puzzles are in the same area
. print around 250K
. Maximum stuff used AAHS size 2 cells
. 7/8 nested derived weak links at maximum.
The second one seems slightly harder than the first one.
If you want to compare with the last one i posted, that one gave the following results
. print over 600K
. necessity to use AAHS over 2 cells
. but a maximum of 4 nested derived links;
If we now look for special tools
I think I already noticed that your 11.8 puzzle has something close to an EXOCET (r56c4). The second one has an EXOCET (r46c1).
None have the SK loop nor a rank0 logic (i did not check for more than 4 floors).
Using the adequate special tool, the print is significantly reduced, but still around 150K.
champagne