denis_berthier wrote:Are you sure it satisfies the parity conditions??
There is a single rectangle 349 in r68c34.
denis_berthier wrote:Are you sure it satisfies the parity conditions??
denis_berthier wrote:
- Code: Select all
........1.....2.34....562....56..1...627.18..8...257...7.......52..6...86.1..8... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
........1.....2.34....562....567.1...628.17..7...258...87......52..6...76.1...... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
........1.....2.34235...6......78.6..8.23....7.35.6....26..78..3.8...7.657.......
Hi Hendrik,
did you check if some have the same minlex expanded version?
Rather than eliminating one of the internals as eleven did, let's consider the externals:denis_berthier wrote:........1.....2.34....562....56..1...627.18..8...257...7.......52..68..76.1..7... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
.---------------------.------------------.----------------------.
| 2 34589 346789 | 3489 3479 349 | 569 56789 1 | resolution state after basics
| 19 589 6789 | 189 179 2 | 569 3 4 | # TH 349b4578, externals 349*
| 1349 3489 34789 | 13489 5 6 | 2 789 89 |
:---------------------+------------------+----------------------:
| 7 #349 5 | 6 8 #349 | 1 249 239 |
|#349 6 2 | 7 #349 1 | 8 459 359 |
| 8 1 349 |#349 2 5 | 7 469 369 |
:---------------------+------------------+----------------------:
|#349 7 *3489 | 25 *1349 #349 | 56–349 12568–9 2568–9|
| 5 2 #349 |#1349 6 8 | 349 19 7 |
| 6 #3489 1 | 25 #349 7 | 3459 2589 2589 |
'---------------------'------------------'----------------------'
denis_berthier wrote:........1.....2.34....562....56..1...627.18..8...257...7.......52..6...86.1..8... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
.--------------------.-------------------.--------------------.
| 2 34589 34679 | 3489 3479 3479 | 569 56789 1 | resolution state after basics
| 19 589 679 | 189 179 2 | 569 3 4 | # TH 349b4578, internals 1r8c4, 7r9c5
| 1349 3489 3479 | 13489 5 6 | 2 789 79 |
:--------------------+-------------------+--------------------:
| 7 #349 5 | 6 8 #349 | 1 249 239 |
|#349 6 2 | 7 #349 1 | 8 459 359 |
| 8 1 #349 |#349 2 5 | 7 469 369 |
:--------------------+-------------------+--------------------:
|#349 7 8 | 25 1349 #349 | 34569 12569 2569 |
| 5 2 #349 |#349+1 6 3479 | 349 79–1 8 |
| 6 #349 1 | 25 #349+7 8 | 3459 2579 2579 |
'--------------------'-------------------'--------------------'
denis_berthier wrote:Wow, 2 new 11.9s and a whole lot (38) of new 11.8s, many of which are not in T&E(2).
Are they all independent, i.e. did you stick to your decision to publish here only the minlex form of expanded puzzles?
........1.....2.......3..45.16.23...27.81.6..3.87.61...32.67..81.7.8....68....... (sub-puzzle of e)
........1.....2.......3..45..1.23....2671.8..73.6.81...8.......2.3.86..761..7.... ED=11.9/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.......3..45..6.......71.8....32..67..8.6..23....837..1..7.281.6.. ED=11.9/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34.35.......62......7.3.25..885...67...8753....3.62.8...52..67.8. (e)
........1.....2.34..2.3156.....564...1.2.43.6.4.31..2.....6......4....5.7.8..5... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34..2.3156.....56.1..1.2.43.6.4.3...2.....6......4....5.7.8..5... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34.23...5....6.78.5..5823.....7.6.5....67.....25.2..78..83..267.5 (d)
........1.....2.34.23...5....6.78....5823.....7.6.5....67.....25.2..78..83...67.5 ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34.23...5....6.78....5823.....7.6.5....67.....25....78..83..267.5 ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34.23...5....6.78.5...823.....7.6.5....67.....25....78..83..267.. ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34.23...5....6.78.5...823.....7.6.5....67.....25.2..78..83...67.. ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34.23...5...5623....2.7.86.5.38.7.5....78......5.2..86..63...78.5 (sub-puzzle of c)
........1.....2.34.23...5....623.....7.8.5...2.8.76.5..87......5.2..76..63...87.5 ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34.23...5....6.78.5...823....37.6.5....67......5.2..78..83...67.5 ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34....562....7.25....5867.1..62.8.17...16......2.5.68..787....... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34....562....1.25....267.18..75.68.1...87......5.2.67..861....... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34235...6...26..78..3.8...7.657........52.78.6.68.23....7.35.6... (sub-puzzle of b)
........1.....2.34....562....567.1...628.17..7...258...87......52..6...76.1...... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
........1.....2.34235...6....2.78.6..8.23....7..5.6....26..78..3.8...7.657....... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
........1.....2.34235...6......78.6..8.23....7.35.6....26..78..3.8...7.657....... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
........1.....2.34....562....1.257...267.18...5.68.1...87......5.2.6...861....... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
........1.....123...1.245.6..3...6...6..52...7.8..6....1..654.3.3.24.15..4.1.3.62 (sub-puzzle of a)
........1.....2.34....562....56..1...627.18..8...257...7.......52..68..76.1..7... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
........1.....2.34.23...5...5623....2.7.86.5.38.7.5....78......5.2..86..63..278.5 (c)
........1.....2.34....562....7.......52.67..816...8....8..25...2.67.18..57.6..1.. ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....234...2.315.6....652...2.1.4..3.4.3..15...4...6...6..53...7.8..6... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34.35...6...72......65...78..8.3.257.6.8653....3.72.6...52..78.6. (sub-puzzle of a)
........1.....2.34....562....1.25....267.18..75.68.1...8.......5.2.68..761...7... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34....562....7.......61..8...25..67..8.7..25....856..1..6.28.17.. ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34235...6...26..78..3.8.2.7.657........52.78.6.68.23....7.35.6... (b)
........1.....2.34....562....56..1...627.18..8...257...7.......52..6...86.1..8... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2) No Tridagon
........1.....2.34235...6...72......65...78..8.3.257.6.8653....3.72.6...52..78.6. (a)
........1.....2.34....562....1.257...267.18...5.68.1...87......5.2.68..761...7... ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....2.34235...6......78.6..8.53....3.72.6....72......65...78..8.3.257.6 ED=11.8/1.2/1.2 not in T&E(2)
........1.....1....23.4..5...6..3.2..7.4...1.2...8.5....9..4.8..67....3.8...3...5 ED=11.2/1.2/1.2 DLFC+DFC
57....9..........8.1.........168..4......28.9..2.9416.....2.....6.9.82.4...41.6..
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/303 nodes): R3C1.9 on ==> R4C1.7 both on & off: r3c1<>9
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/320 nodes): R2C6.9 on ==> R6C4.3 both on & off: r2c6<>9
11.9, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/400 nodes): R2C5.4 on ==> R4C6.3 both on & off: r2c5<>4
11.9, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/423 nodes): R3C5.3 on ==> R8C5.7 both on & off: r3c5<>3
11.8, Region Forcing Chains (w/269 nodes): 5 in column ==> R3C3.6 off: r3c3<>6
........1.....2.......3..45..1.23....267.81..73.61.8...17.6.....8.......2.3.87..6
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/303 nodes): R1C8.3 on ==> R5C8.5 both on & off: r1c8<>3
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/320 nodes): R1C8.2 on ==> R5C5.5 both on & off: r1c8<>2
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/351 nodes): R2C1.9 on ==> R9C4.4 both on & off: r2c1<>9
........1.....2.......3..45..1.23....2671.8..73.6.81...8.......2.3.86..761..7....
11.9, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/410 nodes): R1C8.2 on ==> R2C2.5 both on & off: r1c8<>2
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/283 nodes): R3C2.7 on ==> R8C4.9 both on & off: r3c2<>7
mith wrote:Note that all but one of the puzzles you've marked as "no tridagon" (that is, having more than one extra candidate as guardians for the pattern)
mith wrote:I checked Loki and its 27c friend (rating 11.8 in gsf minlex form, but the same expanded form as Loki) with 1to9's fork of SE, to see what the node counts are (for all 11.8+ steps):
Loki:
- Code: Select all
57....9..........8.1.........168..4......28.9..2.9416.....2.....6.9.82.4...41.6..
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/303 nodes): R3C1.9 on ==> R4C1.7 both on & off: r3c1<>9
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/320 nodes): R2C6.9 on ==> R6C4.3 both on & off: r2c6<>9
11.9, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/400 nodes): R2C5.4 on ==> R4C6.3 both on & off: r2c5<>4
11.9, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/423 nodes): R3C5.3 on ==> R8C5.7 both on & off: r3c5<>3
11.8, Region Forcing Chains (w/269 nodes): 5 in column ==> R3C3.6 off: r3c3<>6
27c 11.8:
- Code: Select all
........1.....2.......3..45..1.23....267.81..73.61.8...17.6.....8.......2.3.87..6
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/303 nodes): R1C8.3 on ==> R5C8.5 both on & off: r1c8<>3
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/320 nodes): R1C8.2 on ==> R5C5.5 both on & off: r1c8<>2
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/351 nodes): R2C1.9 on ==> R9C4.4 both on & off: r2c1<>9
At some point I'd like to dig into the pruning mechanism and figure out why exactly that 11.8 is pruned in Loki but not in the 27c/other morphs.
........1.....2.......3..458.6.......71.8....23..67..8.827.61..61..23...7.381.6.. ED=11.9/11.8/3.4
3.4, Hidden Pair: Cells R4C4,R5C4: 2,3 in block: r4c4<>1,4,5,9, r5c4<>4,5,9
9.2, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/48 nodes): R4C6.9 on ==> R5C1.5 both on & off: r4c6<>9
10.2, Region Forcing Chains (w/48 nodes): 1 in row ==> R6C8.5 off: r6c8<>5
9.6, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/139 nodes): R4C6.5 on ==> R1C8.6 both on & off: r4c6<>5
10.4, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/78 nodes): R1C1.4 on ==> R6C4.4 both on & off: r1c1<>4
10.4, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/76 nodes): R1C1.5 on ==> R6C4.5 both on & off: r1c1<>5
10.6, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/140 nodes): R2C4.4 on ==> R5C6.5 both on & off: r2c4<>4
10.4, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/77 nodes): R1C2.4 on ==> R8C4.4 both on & off: r1c2<>4
11.0, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/126 nodes): R4C9.4 on ==> R6C3.4 both on & off: r4c9<>4
11.1, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/139 nodes): R4C8.5 on ==> R6C3.5 both on & off: r4c8<>5
11.1, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/148 nodes): R1C3.5 on ==> R9C6.5 both on & off: r1c3<>5
10.4, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/78 nodes): R2C5.5 on ==> R8C4.5 both on & off: r2c5<>5
11.1, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/158 nodes): R5C9.4 on ==> R6C3.4 both on & off: r5c9<>4
2.6, Pointing: Cells R4C7,R5C7,R6C7: 4 in block and column: r8c7<>4
11.2, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/195 nodes): R2C4.9 on ==> R9C6.5 both on & off: r2c4<>9
11.2, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/218 nodes): R4C7.2 on ==> R6C3.9 both on & off: r4c7<>2
11.5, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/128 nodes): R1C2.9 on ==> R9C6.9 both on & off: r1c2<>9
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/303 nodes): R1C8.3 on ==> R7C8.5 both on & off: r1c8<>3
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/325 nodes): R2C1.3 on ==> R6C3.9 both on & off: r2c1<>3
1.2, Hidden Single: R1C1: 3 in block 1: r1c1=3
11.9, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/418 nodes): R2C3.7 on ==> R4C2.9 both on & off: r2c3<>7
11.9, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/446 nodes): R1C3.9 on ==> R6C3.5 both on & off: r1c3<>9
........1.....2.......3..458.1.23....267.81..73.61.8...17.6....68.......2.3.87..6 ED=11.8/11.8/3.4
3.4, Hidden Pair: Cells R7C4,R8C4: 2,3 in block: r7c4<>4,5,9, r8c4<>1,4,5,9
9.2, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/48 nodes): R8C6.9 on ==> R7C1.5 both on & off: r8c6<>9
10.2, Region Forcing Chains (w/48 nodes): 1 in row ==> R9C8.5 off: r9c8<>5
9.6, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/139 nodes): R8C6.5 on ==> R1C8.8 both on & off: r8c6<>5
10.4, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/78 nodes): R1C1.4 on ==> R9C2.4 both on & off: r1c1<>4
10.4, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/76 nodes): R1C1.5 on ==> R9C2.5 both on & off: r1c1<>5
10.6, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/140 nodes): R2C4.4 on ==> R7C6.5 both on & off: r2c4<>4
10.4, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/77 nodes): R1C3.4 on ==> R4C4.4 both on & off: r1c3<>4
11.0, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/126 nodes): R8C9.4 on ==> R9C2.4 both on & off: r8c9<>4
11.1, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/139 nodes): R8C8.5 on ==> R9C2.5 both on & off: r8c8<>5
11.1, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/143 nodes): R1C2.5 on ==> R9C4.5 both on & off: r1c2<>5
10.4, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/78 nodes): R2C5.5 on ==> R4C4.5 both on & off: r2c5<>5
11.1, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/158 nodes): R4C7.4 on ==> R9C2.4 both on & off: r4c7<>4
2.6, Pointing: Cells R4C9,R5C9,R6C9: 4 in block and column: r7c9<>4
11.2, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/195 nodes): R2C4.9 on ==> R6C6.5 both on & off: r2c4<>9
11.2, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/218 nodes): R8C7.2 on ==> R4C2.5 both on & off: r8c7<>2
11.5, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/128 nodes): R1C3.9 on ==> R6C6.9 both on & off: r1c3<>9
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/303 nodes): R1C8.3 on ==> R5C8.5 both on & off: r1c8<>3
11.8, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/320 nodes): R1C8.2 on ==> R5C5.5 both on & off: r1c8<>2
2.6, Pointing: Cells R1C7,R3C7: 2 in block and column: r7c7<>2
11.1, Contradiction Forcing Chain (w/149 nodes): R2C1.3 on ==> R9C2.9 both on & off: r2c1<>3
1.2, Hidden Single: R1C1: 3 in block 1: r1c1=3
mith wrote:For further clarity on the SE rating difference, I reverted Loki to gsf minlex (still 11.9), added singles to both puzzles without morphing, and compared the solve paths.
1to9only wrote:The lksudoku fix is only applied to the nested parts of chains in dynamic and multiple chains.
A version of lksudoku fix must also be applied to the final chain when determining the chain to be selected/applied.
........1.....2.......3..458.6.......71.8....23..67..8.827.61..61..23...7.381.6.. ED=11.9/11.8/3.4
........1.....2.......3..458.1.23....267.81..73.61.8...17.6....68.......2.3.87..6 ED=11.8/11.8/3.4