## Nasty Killer Sudoku Variant

For fans of Killer Sudoku, Samurai Sudoku and other variants
Animator wrote:All you need to do is change some numbers in the solution and re-calculate the cage-sums.

Surely verifying uniqueness of the solution is the hardest bit when creating a puzzle ? If we change some of the numbers, are we still guaranteed uniqueness ?
afjt

Posts: 82
Joined: 07 September 2005

If all you did was to get a Killer puzzle, change some of the numbers (say, change all the 2s to 14s, all the 6s to 10s and all the 8s to 17s,) there's no guarantee you'd get a valid Face Ripper (as this type has been dubbed) puzzle, is there? Because Killers are constructed so that they can ve solved with the knowledge that the numbers used are 1-9, so the equivalent Face Ripper might not be solveable.

I think the puzzle was constructed by getting a finished (regular) sudoky grid, changing some of the digits used, and then putting cages in so that it was solveable.
PaulIQ164

Posts: 533
Joined: 16 July 2005

True, you need to do a bit more then just replacing all numbers... (To guarantee uniqness that is. It should always be 'solvable'.)

You need to make sure that the list of numbers is the only possible combination.

(For example, if you have 18 in your grid then you need to make sure the person can select the right combination. 2 + 16 for example and not 4 + 14. Basically, doing what I did in my previous post and seeing that you end up with 1 combination.)
Animator

Posts: 469
Joined: 08 April 2005

Oh, I thought I would add: when I solved this puzzle, I first looked for single cell values (e.g. doing a '65' on C9). That provided 4 or 5 values. Then I did the N2/N5 thing to get the rest.
Mel-o-rama

Posts: 19
Joined: 02 February 2006

Mel-o-rama wrote:Was it hard to create?

You know, I've no idea. I've never made any other sudoku puzzle by hand.

It was a bit of a pain, but I don't think I encountered any problems that were unique to the "Face Ripper". I don't know if I went about it the most sensible way, but it didn't seem worth coming up with a system to make one puzzle. The first one I came up with had four solutions, but that was fairly easily fixed (I didn't have to start over).
AndrewTaylor

Posts: 2
Joined: 20 July 2005

Previous