Looking at the matters again... what Myth posted does require life support............so it can't be a franken fish.......
if we are going to include everything that requires life support (Anything outside the pattern regarding the proof) then it should be called a Kraken fish........so everything from Almost fish to the use of NICE loops or Siamese patterns should fall under that (with sub headings if needed)...........
in an N row * N columns, you can't have finned cells in multiple boxes that can see an elimination cell......so that throws the multi finned fish out of the window......
Regarding the franken fish.......as the cover sectors now cover boxes.....we can have 2 options......Either to apply Franken to (Classic, Finned, Sahimi & headless) or as Mike mentioned (Bif Finned & Franken) or leave everything that uses boxes as cover as FRANKEN & mention fins if present (which sounds resonable).......
So the list for now to me looks like this
- Code: Select all
Fish#1 Classic fish (no extras (Fins))
Fish#2 Finned fish (Not Headless Not sahimi)
Fish#3 Sashimi fish (Not headless)
Fish#4 Headless fish (No simpler counterpart)
Fish#5 Franken Fish (Any fish 1-4 that uses a box or boxes in the cover sectors) (No simpler counterpart)
Fish#6 Kraken Fish (Any Fish from 1-5 that survives by using Candidates out of the pattern)
Fish 1-4 are categorised in that way to allow junior fishermen who are already familiar with classic concepts to have a good learning curve towards the more difficult ones
What Mike has suggested -I think- goes along these line
- Code: Select all
Classic Fish (N rows * N columns)
Finned Fish (N rows * N columns) + Extras (Fin)
Big Fish (Box or Boxes in cover sectors) No extras
Franken fish (Box or Boxes in cover sectors)+ Extras (Fin)
Kraken Fish (survives through candidates outside the pattern)
Which also sounds fine, but may confuse biginners IMO as you will have people saying "Sashimi, finned sashimi, finned" describing the same thing.
tarek