Your rules as stated are ambiguous and confusing, or maybe I'm too stupid to understand them. Furthermore, even if I make some assumptions about them (like that a gray cell must be either 1 or 9 and actually part of one or the other compartment), I can't solve even this "easy" example. Can you show a walk-through of the logic you're expecting to be used here?
Here's as far as I get with basic techniques (or anything I'm willing to do anyway):
- Code: Select all
.-----------------.------------------------.---------------------.
| 2 78 9 | 1 345 345 | 345 6 78 |
| 3 678 567 | 24579 4578 24589 | 1245 1245 789 |
| [1] 4 57 | 2579 6 23589 | 235 235 789 |
:-----------------+------------------------+---------------------:
| 467 567 3 | 45679 2 45689 | 45679 4578 [1] |
| 467 567 12 | 45679 34578 1345689 | 245679 24578 245 |
| 8 [9] 12 | 4567 457 1456 | 24567 2457 3 |
:-----------------+------------------------+---------------------:
| 9 1 8 | 2456 45 2456 | 37 37 245 |
| 5 2 4 | 3 [1] 7 | 8 9 6 |
| 67 3 67 | 8 9 245 | 1245 1245 245 |
'-----------------'------------------------'---------------------'
Have I made mistakes? If not, how do you proceed from there? It seems to me that all the compartment rules have already been exhausted, so it's just vanilla sudoku rules left -- and with just those this is not possible to solve. (Or more accurately, it has over 500 solutions according to SudokuWiki, so it can't be solved logically. The same thing with your other example in the Definition page. I'm thinking the published solution must be just one of many. Did you ever check that?)
What am I missing? It must be something obvious since you call this easy... And please don't give me a similar non-answer as you did
here. I'm still awaiting a further explanation for that puzzle as well.
PS. I'm starting to suspect that you don't even check that your puzzles have a single solution. If so, that's simply unforgivable, because nothing is more frustrating for a manual solver (except maybe that a puzzle has no solution at all). It's already been clear that you don't have a proper way to assess the difficulty of your puzzles because you don't have a solver that uses logical techniques. That's annoying too but less severe. At the very least you should have a brute force solver that checks for multiple solutions before you publish anything. Until you address this suspicion, I won't be trying more of your puzzles.