JPF wrote:Sorry,
The two 1-steeper's (42 clues) are not symmetrically minimal.
JPF
Thanks. Both your 42-clues 1-steppers are 'best' so far, in this category! But here is a replacement for the 'symmetrically minimal':
- Code: Select all
A 44-clue 1-stepper, full symmetry, symmetrically minimal.
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 6 5 | 2 . 7 | 9 3 . |
| 1 . . | 5 . 8 | . . 4 |
| 7 . 9 | 3 . 6 | 2 . 8 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 5 1 3 | . . . | 6 8 2 |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| 4 9 6 | . . . | 3 1 7 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 9 . 8 | 6 . 1 | 4 . 5 |
| 3 . . | 7 . 2 | . . 6 |
| . 2 1 | 4 . 9 | 8 7 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
Also 3 more 44-clues symmetrically minimal one-steppers. But the first one (above) is 'the most overdetermined':
608703902020408050503209406286000594000000000415000837704901308060305070109806205
004107300002893500590204087259000741010000050738000692380502016001386200005901400
046208530720403096800509007234000169000000000579000382400705003190304058058601270
These might suit as 'first puzzles' in 'beginner's books'. (I always wondered why they put such hard puzzles there...).
#
And for the sake of beauty:
- Code: Select all
Another 20-stepper with full symmetry:
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 4 . | . 5 . | . 8 . |
| 7 . . | . 3 . | . . 4 |
| . . 3 | 7 . 4 | 2 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 4 | . . . | 1 . . |
| 8 3 . | . . . | . 6 9 |
| . . 6 | . . . | 8 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 8 | 5 . 6 | 7 . . |
| 6 . . | . 1 . | . . 8 |
| . 1 . | . 2 . | . 5 . |
+-------+-------+-------+