eleven wrote:Yes, please make it with letters, that's the solid way (but you will not have the solver to do the basics for you then).
We probably have a different view on this.
I don't think there is anything wrong with using a solver to carry out the basics the second time through, since I've already done them once (even if I possibly missed some, I did all that were needed).
Using letters won't take this away from me, since I will still put the same digits back in, one way or the other, and just remember that I may have to swap them at the end, if I find out that my 2 corresponds to 4 in the original puzzle.
What will get more complicated, though, is posting diagrams, since I will have to manually edit them to show the letters.
If you know of a GUI that lets me use letters instead of certain digits and copy the grid with the letters, I will be glad to use it.
It will definitely save me more time then not having to repeat the basics.
eleven wrote:But you don't know (after applying basics), which is x and which is y (in other puzzles - or using harder techniques - that could turn out).
Other puzzles...
Such as the one I originally transposed into, by trading the 2r4c8 for 2r2c5, which definitely cannot have a 2 in r2c1.
Or the one I chose later with 4r2c5, because I thought showing a diagram with a different solution would be confusing (again, you can say it makes the path look shorter than it is, because there is no guarantee that you won't have to swap them to match the initial givens, as I originally had to).
eleven wrote:So what you did, was just cheating: you looked into the solution.
I was about to apologise and say that I didn't know you only allowed paths from the first time going through the puzzle (before solving it and seeing the solution), but then I realised this isn't even your puzzle.
Shye, if you would rather see me post my original paths without any refinements, PM me about it.
Other puzzle constructors, please do the same.
Marek