7b53 wrote:The logic was from SteveG48
Sorry, my friend!
You did not quote Steve, nor copy or even reference his grid, you posted your own version. So when you wrote the following, it appeared you were making your own statement:
7b53 wrote: looks like a one cell DP (39)r89c29 => r8c7 <> 2
I understood Steve, you probably didn't notice my comment. Now I see where you were coming from ... mostly. You kinda threw me off with the "one cell DP" thing
