Maybe someone should write a "unique loops for dummies", a link is missing in Mikes collection.wapati wrote:I saw the SE explaination, just don't get it.
Here is a short version:
UL patterns are merely harder to spot than UR's:
Those are ones:
- Code: Select all
. . . | . . . | . . . . . 12 | . 12 . | . . .
. . . | . . . | . . . . . . | . . . | . . .
. . . | . . . | . . . 12 . . | . 12 . | . . .
------------------------ --------------------------
12 . . | . . . | . . 12 . . . | . . . | . . .
12 . . | 12. . | . . . . . . | . . . | . . .
. . . | 12. . | . . 12 12 . 12 | . . . | . . .
And this is not one:
- Code: Select all
. . . | . . . | . . .
. . . | . . . | . . .
12 . . | . . . | . . 12
------------------------
. . . | . . . | . . .
12 . . | 12. . | . . .
. . . | 12. . | . . 12
Each of the cells must see another one in the same box, the same row and the same column (so in each unit - especially each box, like for UR's - you have exactly 2 of them). Then there is no other cell outside the pattern, that could "fix" the pattern - always 2 solutions are possible.
In the last sample the other 1 or 2 in the boxes above will fix it.
Now, like for UR at least one of the extra candidates must be true.
If you have one extra candidate, it must be true (type 1).
If you have 2 with the same number, you can eliminate it from all cells, that see both (type 2).
If you have extra numbers in only 2 cells of one unit and one of the UL numbers is conjugated in this unit (no other cell has it), you can eliminate the other UL number there (type 4).
If you have 2 extra numbers in only 2 cells of one unit and a pair of those extra numbers in the same unit (or 3 and 2 triples or 4 and 3 quads), you can eliminate them from the other cells of that unit (type 3).