IJ wrote:I agree it's quite a nice idea, but I think there are a couple of problems...
You would need to be careful that the last cell completed is one of the letters in the word, otherwise the puzzler could get the answer before completing the puzzle. This obviously makes setting the puzzle a lot harder - In fact, I'm fairly sure it's not even possible.
Equally it becomes a game of hangman - how many 9 letter words would you not guess with only one or two letters missing?
I don't think it is particularly important that someone could find the word before completing the entire puzzle or that you could guess a few missing letters.
Today when when you enter any sort of newspaper competition you are essentially entering a lucky dip - the difficulty of the puzzle only slightly modifies the size of the post bag for choosing the winner.
Most of us do Sudoku and crosswords for the intellectual exercise rather than competition entry so would carry on to solve the entire puzzle even if we had spotted the hidden word.
In AFJ's excellent sample I was suprised how well Obfuscate was obfuscated! Even knowing what the word is and where it is it is not readily obvious (to me).
I suggested a nine letter word because it fits with the standard 9x9 grid but obviously the same idea works with larger grids, shorter words, or phrases.