WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Everything about Sudoku that doesn't fit in one of the other sections

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby Pupp » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:07 am

Solved my first hard puzzle! Using 10,000 Sudokus Plus (android).

The Advanced 5 could be solved with normal stuff, although somewhat tricky.

The first hard puzzle I did, I had to use X-wing on 2 different numbers (6 and 8), in order to find a hidden single, which was cell with the number 8 left as a pencil mark.

After that, the rest of the puzzle pretty much just lined up.

Considering I didn't have to use X-wing on any of the Advance 5 puzzles, I was surprised I had to solve two X-wings in order to uncover a hidden single with the very first HARD puzzle, but solving that REALLY MADE MY DAY!!!
Pupp
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 18 October 2019

Re: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby Pupp » Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:46 am

OMG!!!!!
I did a second Hard puzzle, and it was not hard at all. Not even a single triple, let alone an X-wing.

There were several doubles I needed to finess, but that's not a hard puzzle in my opinion.

I haven't come across a quad yet, but I'm under the impression, from tidbits picked up on the internet, that it's rare, unless someone hand crafts a puzzle with that.

( of course rare is relative considering there are over 6 septillion possible sudoku puzzles. :lol:
Pupp
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 18 October 2019

Re: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby Pupp » Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:40 am

So far I've solved all the hard ones I've tried. Usually I skip to the next level after a few are solved, but I think there new tricks for me to discover, so I'll stay on Hard level 1 for a while.
Pupp
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 18 October 2019

Re: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby Pupp » Mon Jul 20, 2020 11:47 pm

I have a question now...

I came across this the other day, but can't remember the name of the technique. (Which I conveniently used to solve my last hard puzzle.)

You have 3 digits that repeat in 4 squares that make a box, but one of the 4 squares has an extra digit. The extra digit is the only digit that can go in that box, leaving the other 3 boxes for the 3 digits. Those 3 digits HAVE to go in those 3 boxes that are left over. It doesn't seem to be an X-Wing or an XY Wing, so I'm not sure I read about it, or just figured that out myself.

Of course, you can't solve those 3 boxes immediately, but solving the box with the extra digit was the point of the technique.

Anyway, I was wondering what that technique was called.

Oddly enough, I check the puzzle with Soduku Explainer, and it didn't mention that technique at all, so I apparently I sidestepped the easier, but longer way to solve the puzzle.
Pupp
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 18 October 2019

Re: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby SpAce » Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:35 am

Hi Pupp,

Pupp wrote:I came across this the other day, but can't remember the name of the technique. (Which I conveniently used to solve my last hard puzzle.)

You have 3 digits that repeat in 4 squares that make a box, but one of the 4 squares has an extra digit. The extra digit is the only digit that can go in that box, leaving the other 3 boxes for the 3 digits. Of course, you can't solve those 3 boxes immediately, but solving the box with the extra digit was the point of the technique.

Anyway, I was wondering what that technique was called.

I can't quite decipher your description. I guess by "square" you mean what we call a cell? What exactly do you mean by "box"'? In our parlance a box is one of the nine 3x3 areas, aka nonets or blocks.

If you provided a screenshot of the situation, I'm sure we'd know immediately what you're talking about. (Even better if you could attach a text-based grid with the pencil marks and the pattern of interest marked, like what we do in the Puzzles section. Good software solvers can export those easily.)

Oddly enough, I check the puzzle with Soduku Explainer, and it didn't mention that technique at all, so I apparently I sidestepped the easier, but longer way to solve the puzzle.

Have you tried more modern solvers, such as Hodoku, or even more modern ones like YZF_Sudoku or Sukaku Explainer? I don't have personal experience with the latter two, but based on others' experiences they seem really good. (Hodoku fulfills most of my needs quite nicely, and I'm really lazy trying out new software solvers.)
User avatar
SpAce
 
Posts: 2321
Joined: 22 May 2017

Re: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby Pupp » Tue Jul 21, 2020 3:39 am

Just to be clear: I SOLVED THE PUZZLE, then later put it through Sudoku Explainer, just to see it's rating mainly.

When I say square, I mean like an X-Wing thing, not a single cell, so it was 4 cells. That is, say 4/5/9 was in three of the cells, and 4/5/6/9 was in the 4th cell. So that leaves 3 cells that can only be either 4, 5, or 9. And the only cell with the 6, had to be the "6", since the other 3 numbers (4/5/9) are forced into the 3 other cells.

I was looking for quads at the time, but I notice I had these three numbers that were in 4 cells, with only a single cell containing an extra number, so I figured the extra number had to be in that cell. But what caught my eye is that the 4 cells made a box or rectangle (as oppose to a skyscraper formation).

I put the puzzle through Suduko Explainer. Apparently it finds the path that has the least difficult techniques. According to Sudoku Explainer, it's rated 2.0 (even though it was in the Hard section of my app.), but instead of what I did, it said I should have found 2x "direct hidden pairs". Not really sure I found those or not, since hidden singles and pairs is so ordinary to solve puzzles at the HARD level, that it doesn't really register as anything other than routine and expected in most of the puzzles.

In any event, after I selected the "6" for that one cell, the puzzle pretty much collapsed: singles were lining up all over the board.

I'm just trying to find the name of the technique I used.
Pupp
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 18 October 2019

Re: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby SpAce » Tue Jul 21, 2020 6:25 pm

Pupp wrote:Just to be clear: I SOLVED THE PUZZLE

Perhaps, but based on your description I can't see any valid logic justifying it. Otherwise your description is still lacking crucial details to imagine the exact pattern.

When I say square, I mean like an X-Wing thing, not a single cell, so it was 4 cells.

Ok, thanks for the clarification. So you mean 4 cells in a square (or any rectangular?) shape? (That's not what you said originally. You specifically talked about 4 squares instead of 1, so it seemed like you used 'square' for a cell and 'box' for four cells in a square formation. Hence the confusion.)

That is, say 4/5/9 was in three of the cells, and 4/5/6/9 was in the 4th cell. So that leaves 3 cells that can only be either 4, 5, or 9. And the only cell with the 6, had to be the "6", since the other 3 numbers (4/5/9) are forced into the 3 other cells.

Unless all four cells were in the same house (row, column, box), I don't see any valid pattern that would let you conclude that 6 had to be in the fourth cell. If all four cells were in the same house, then it was simply a quad with one digit in a single cell (forcing it there), or more simply a triple that eliminated three digits from the fourth cell leaving there a naked single. The only way four cells can be in the same house in a rectangular formation is if they're in the same box (i.e. 3x3 block). Were they?

I was looking for quads at the time, but I notice I had these three numbers that were in 4 cells, with only a single cell containing an extra number, so I figured the extra number had to be in that cell. But what caught my eye is that the 4 cells made a box or rectangle (as oppose to a skyscraper formation).

'Rectangle' is a good, unambiguous word to describe a pattern shape. Please don't use 'box' for that purpose. In any case, like I said, I don't see a valid solving pattern based on that description, unless all four cells were in the same box.

In any event, after I selected the "6" for that one cell, the puzzle pretty much collapsed: singles were lining up all over the board.

I'm just trying to find the name of the technique I used.

"Lucky guess"? :)

Like I said, you should provide exact details of the pattern, preferably with an image. I don't think any of us are willing to make further guesses on what you really had based on such vague information. Questions are welcome, but you should provide enough information so they can actually be answered.

PS. The proper section for questions about solving techniques is Help with puzzles and solving techniques.
User avatar
SpAce
 
Posts: 2321
Joined: 22 May 2017

Re: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby Pupp » Tue Jul 21, 2020 8:18 pm

It was a hidden quad essentially, but just the easiest version possible. No extra pencil marks to get rid of, and only a single box with four digits.

This is the END of the thread. I'm not going to make anymore replies for any reason whatsoever.
Pupp
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 18 October 2019

Re: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Postby tarek » Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:18 pm

Pupp wrote:I'm not going to make anymore replies for any reason whatsoever.
Charming!
User avatar
tarek
 
Posts: 3708
Joined: 05 January 2006


Return to General