Until recently I have always been pro UR and thought the UR pattern was deadly. I have cracked countless puzzles using this technique. I started working a number of the Sudoku9981 expert and extreme puzzles. On 2 out of hundreds of these puzzles, I came across type 1 UR patterns and when I applied the technique I quickly ran into a contradiction. At first I assumed that the puzzles did not have a unique solution, but I used other techniques to solve at least one of these and a unique solution did exist with a UR pattern. I thought about logical arguments for why the pattern is called deadly. Certainly the candidates in the pattern can be interchanged and the row and columns are still valid, but ahat about the boxes? Shouldn't one investigate if these are interchangeable in the boxes also before using this technique? Now I only use this technique as a last resort and I check the boxes where the cells are before I use it. Has anyone else encountered these undeadly UR patterns in puzzles they have worked. The puzzle that I have worked is Sudoku9981 Expert Book 26 #8. The Type 1 UR pattern in a partially worked puzzle is in row 3 and 7 and columns 6 and 7. Three of the cells in the rectangular pattern have 35 as candidates and the other has 357. Here is the partially worked pattern. To get to this point in the puzzle I used a 3 x-wing, a 9 2-string kite and a 4 2-string kite. I have not shown the candidates in the cells marked -. Setting r7c7 = 7 as the type 1 UR rule suggests leads to a contradiction. The undeadly 35 UR pattern exists but the puzzle has a unique solution. I did not use the information obtained from the random contradiction to finish solving this puzzle because that would be trial and error.

| - 3 - | - - - | 2 - - |

| - 6 5 | 2 - 4 | - - 1 |

| 7 1 2 | 6 8 35 | 35 4 9 |

| 5 9 - | - - 6 | - 7 2 |

| 1 2 - | - - 8 | - 9 - |

| - 7 6 | 5 2 9 | - - 3 |

| 6 8 1 | 9 4 35 | 357 2 - |

| - 4 9 | - - 7 | - - 8 |

| - 5 7 | 8 - - | 9 - 4 |