So all of our batch postings are going to change forever

I will be using it for postings in that regard.
I hope that it is not too slow, in any case that would be an incentive towards limiting the number of posted puzzles.
Thanx,
tarek
tarek wrote:I will be using it for postings in that regard.
I hope that it is not too slow, in any case that would be an incentive towards limiting the number of posted puzzles.
# Golden Nugget
. . . | . . 9 | . . 5 . . . | . . 1 | . . 5
. 3 . | . . . | . 7 . . 3 . | . . . | . 7 .
. . 2 | . 8 . | 6 . . . . 2 | . 8 . | 6 . .
-------+-------+------- -------+-------+-------
. . 8 | . . 2 | 4 . . . . . | 6 . 8 | 9 . .
. . . | 6 4 . | . . . . . 8 | 4 . . | . . .
1 . . | 8 . . | . . . 9 . . | . 2 . | . . .
-------+-------+------- -------+-------+-------
. . 6 | 9 . . | 2 . . . . 6 | . 4 . | 2 . .
. 7 . | . . . | . 1 . . 7 . | . . . | . 1 .
5 . . | . . . | . . 3 5 . . | . . . | . . 3
# d-3 (including b5) # d-2 (excluding b5)
ronk wrote:
- Code: Select all
# Golden Nugget
. . . | . . 9 | . . 5 . . . | . . 1 | . . 5
. 3 . | . . . | . 7 . . 3 . | . . . | . 7 .
. . 2 | . 8 . | 6 . . . . 2 | . 8 . | 6 . .
-------+-------+------- -------+-------+-------
. . 8 | . . 2 | 4 . . . . . | 6 . 8 | 9 . .
. . . | 6 4 . | . . . . . 8 | 4 . . | . . .
1 . . | 8 . . | . . . 9 . . | . 2 . | . . .
-------+-------+------- -------+-------+-------
. . 6 | 9 . . | 2 . . . . 6 | . 4 . | 2 . .
. 7 . | . . . | . 1 . . 7 . | . . . | . 1 .
5 . . | . . . | . . 3 5 . . | . . . | . . 3
# d-3 (including b5) # d-2 (excluding b5)
gsf, since I'm the bloke that suggested finding best symmetry excluding the center box, I find that result somewhat unsatisfactory.
Since both permutations are d-2 when ignoring b5, shouldn't including the effect of b5 be the tie-breaker? Or is row minlex a higher priority tie-breaker?
gsf wrote:ronk wrote:Since both permutations are d-2 when ignoring b5, shouldn't including the effect of b5 be the tie-breaker? Or is row minlex a higher priority tie-breaker?
the center box is ignored period
+---+---+---+
|...|...|.12|
|...|...|..3|
|..2|3..|4..|
+---+---+---+
|..1|8..|..5|
|.6.|.7.|8..|
|...|..9|...|
+---+---+---+
|..8|5..|...|
|9..|.4.|5..|
|47.|..6|...|
+---+---+---+ Platinum Blonde
. . 3 | . . . | . . .
. 4 . | . . 2 | . . 3
1 . 2 | . . . | . . .
-------+-------+-------
. . . | . . . | . 9 .
. . 5 | . . 1 | . . 8
. 8 . | 6 . . | 7 . .
-------+-------+-------
. . . | . . 8 | . . 5
. . . | 7 4 . | . 6 .
. 5 . | . 9 . | 4 . . # d-2
gsf wrote:ronk wrote:Isn't row minlex of the pattern supposed to be a factor here
only in a tie break with another symmetry with same distance
ronk wrote:gsf wrote:ronk wrote:Isn't row minlex of the pattern supposed to be a factor here
only in a tie break with another symmetry with same distance
I agree, but this looks like "d-2" versus "a-2" to me ... where the row minlex should vote for "a-2."
JPF wrote:Could we find minimal puzzles with symmetry modulo n ; n>9 ?
. . . . * . * . 1
. . . . * 2 . 3 .
. 4 5 * . * 2 6 7
* . . . 4 8 * . .
* 8 . 3 . 5 . 9 4
. . 4 9 2 . . . 3
* 9 8 5 . 4 3 * .
. 3 . * 8 . . . .
5 . 2 . 9 . . . . rotational symmetry 'off-by'11'
+---+---+---+
|...|...|..5|
|..4|..5|.82|
|.8.|..4|39.|
+---+---+---+
|...|..2|.3.|
|.9.|.36|...|
|.43|1.7|...|
+---+---+---+
|.39|...|.5.|
|4.2|...|8.9|
|85.|.2.|.4.|
+---+---+---+
........5..4..5.82.8...439......2.3..9..36....431.7....39....5.4.2...8.985..2..4. # d-7
.87.........2.19....1.87......5642..84....5.92..8..3.6..81....3.6........7.4....5
986.....2....3.........76.41..3.4...4....98...6.7.....61..7.2....742.1.88....1.36
9...5...37...3..8132....6.4.7...8.6..3.29......5......84...1..9......1....2..98.6
.9.5........63..813..9.76....9...........4.....51..3.847.3.9.25.1.......96......7
JPF wrote:For each of those puzzles could you show the morphs with n=6 ?
...456.8..5.7...32.8.....46........5....12.....156....36....9..5.8.9..649......58
1.....78......91.278........7.5....4.6.......8..3....1..26.3..8.489.5........2465
...4.67.........3.6892.......863.1..7..8.1.24.16..2.7..6......7..4..89....1...4.3
.234.6.....718..3...93...5.2..6.89.......1....489..1..5.........3.....92.7..6.8..
.234.6.8..5.1....6.98............9.....91236..4.....7...47.5....6....8..7.2.9....
..34..7..4...8.2.6..8...1.523.............6...648.7..3.1.7....8...9......8.3..92.
..3..67.9...18..36.9......5.697......1........7452.9.35..8.3..1......4..9........
.23.5.......1892..86.3.....27....195.......2...4...3.7.......4....29..7.7.6....5.
.1....2344.2..516.........7....4.781..7.1.9...8.29............5.5.7.96.21.64.....
123.4..5.....6.1.4......2.7....825.1............3...6...6...4..3.5.748...42.5..76
........12.1..3456..6.74..8.....138.7....5....29......4...6.5..915...........9..4
.1.......2.3.45.67..68..1536........1..354..6...7....8..2..6371....7.9.44........
1...23........4...25.67.....4523.8.99.......27.1.5.3...7..4..2.....9.....9.36..5.
123.4........5.....5.6...7271....8.....4.6...296.1...59..8.2.14......6........958
...1....23.1.4.5..6..3..17.8..43...97..9.1...4....2..6.84...9....5...64.1.....2..
.....1....23.4....1..5632...6..75.2.2.......8.5..8.67.3.21.8....4...65.....4...8.
.1..234....5...........627.8....1.5.......8...5.2.4.1..835..62....3..7.1..146...8
......1234....56....3..2.7.3...74.5.........76..58..94..9...5....642.9.88.1......
.1...2.3...4.3.....5....678.79.......3..1....1......9...2....6.....2475..978.312.
.....1.......23.4.564......6.3..2....51.672..7.....1.33....86.9.9.17.5...1.......
....123.4...56..781..47.....4.....296...49....2............5..321..9.4..3.5.....7
JPF wrote:Now, the new target is 11.
...456.8..5.7...32.8.....46........5....12.....156....36....9..5.8.9..649......58
...4.67.........3.6892.......863.1..7..8.1.24.16..2.7..6......7..4..89....1...4.3
.234.6.8..5.1....6.98............9.....91236..4.....7...47.5....6....8..7.2.9....
.23.5.......1892..86.3.....27....195.......2...4...3.7.......4....29..7.7.6....5.
12.4.....4.7.8....69....4.1.3........61.....5..5.7..12..45..1.....8...2...276453.