Bump wrote:I frequently come to a stalemate when doing the Sunday Times Superior Sudoku. There appears to be no other option than guesswork. Can anyone help.
chrisr wrote:A "Superior" Sudoku can have (mandatory) ...., Quads
chrisr wrote:A "Superior" Sudoku can have (mandatory) ...., Quads
tarek wrote:No it doesn't, no quads allowed in a Superior (The ones compiled by Poppacom).........
tarek wrote:chrisr wrote:A "Superior" SuDoku [ a Pappocom-generated Very Hard ]
can have Triples, Quads and X-Wings
No it doesn't,
no quads allowed in a "Superior" (the ones generated by Pappocom).
RW wrote:That's because you stare at the pencilmarks, I find hidden subsets much easier to spot in a non-pmgrid.
tarek wrote:I myself would consider naked subsets, much easier to spot than hidden ones,....
RW wrote:That's because you stare at the pencilmarks, I find hidden subsets much easier to spot in a non-pmgrid.
tarek wrote:Would it be possible to rank subsets according to difficulty of spotting them from your point of view?
(e.g. would a hidden triple be easier than a naked double?)
tarek wrote:chrisr wrote:A "Superior" SuDoku [ a Pappocom-generated Very Hard ]
can have Triples, Quads and X-Wings
No it doesn't,
no quads allowed in a "Superior" (the ones generated by Pappocom).
. . . | 1 . . | . . .
. . 2 | . . 5 | 4 . .
5 . . | . 4 . | 8 3 .
-------+-------+------
1 . 5 | 9 . 2 | . . .
4 . . | . . . | . . 8
. . . | 8 . 4 | 3 . 5
-------+-------+------
. 5 3 | . 9 . | . . 6
. . 7 | 5 . . | 1 . .
. . . | . . 6 | . . .