Stumped on very hard puzzle

Advanced methods and approaches for solving Sudoku puzzles

Stumped on very hard puzzle

Postby RickM » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:37 pm

this is from sudoku.com, which says all their puzzles are solvable without guessing or allowing branches... but I'm stuck.

{67}{679}{469}{57}{2}{1}{8}{3457}{347}
{1278}{178}{248}{57}{6}{3}{1457}{9}{47}
{3}{17}{5}{8}{4}{9}{6}{17}{2}
{268}{4}{2689}{3}{589}{7}{259}{258}{1}
{178}{13789}{89}{2}{589}{6}{34579}{34578}{34789}
{5}{3789}{289}{1}{89}{4}{2379}{6}{3789}
{9}{68}{7}{46}{3}{2}{14}{148}{5}
{68}{2}{3}{46}{1}{5}{479}{478}{4789}
(4}{5}{1}{9}{7}{8}{23}{23}{6}

I've just registered - I hope this is in a usable format.
RickM
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 August 2005

Postby SteveF » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:59 pm

Have a close look at box 4, you should be able to see a naked quad.

This should allow you to enter a candidate in column 2.
SteveF
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 26 March 2005

Postby RickM » Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:11 am

Box 4 being:

{268}{4}{2689}
{178}{13789}{89}
{5}{3789}{289} ?

I can't find it..:)
RickM
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 August 2005

Postby Dusty Chalk » Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:29 am

SteveF wrote:Have a close look at box 4, you should be able to see a naked quad.

This should allow you to enter a candidate in column 2.
He left out a step of indirection -- the naked quad doesn't yield the candidate, it removes candidates from box four. The changes to the two boxes in column 2 of box four yield a naked trio in column 2 which -- once you've eliminated those from elsewhere in column 2 -- yields the candidate.
Dusty Chalk
 
Posts: 21
Joined: 15 August 2005

Postby RickM » Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:29 am

Okay... I found the 1-3-7 triple in box 4... guess I was blind...
but I'm still stumped...
RickM
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 August 2005

Postby Dusty Chalk » Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:32 am

RickM wrote:Okay... I found the 1-3-7 triple in box 4... guess I was blind...
but I'm still stumped...
But that causes another 1-3-7 triple in column 2...
Dusty Chalk
 
Posts: 21
Joined: 15 August 2005

Postby RickM » Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:36 am

I used the 1-3-7 triple to put a 9 in c2r1...

but I never did find the quad...
RickM
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 August 2005

Postby RickM » Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:42 am

Thanks for being patient... but please explain in detail... I eliminated the 8s and 9s from c1r5, c2r5, c2r6. That still leaves me 7s in 4 cells in r2? How does that result in a second triple?

It did leave a naked 9 in c2r1, so I can go ahead with the solution, but I am interested in the logic you guys are applying.
RickM
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 August 2005

Postby RickM » Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:53 am

Sorry... meant 4 7s in c2 above...
RickM
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 August 2005

Postby SteveF » Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:41 am

The initial quad I found is in cells r4c1, r4c3, r5c3 and r6c3. The only candidates for these four cells are the 4 values of 2, 6, 8 and 9.

As Dusty Chalk correctly points out, this allows you to remove 2, 6, 8, and 9 as candidates from the other cells in box 4.

My next step was to put a 9 in r1c2, it is the only place a 9 can go in column 2, which is the step I think you have found.

I think the triple that others have referred to is in r3c2, r5c2, r6c2? However once you have placed a 9 in r1c2 you don't actually need this, a number of 'only one possibility for a cell' situations lead on from this.
SteveF
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 26 March 2005

Postby RickM » Fri Aug 19, 2005 1:42 pm

Thanks. I have to say it's amazing how long one can stare at one of these puzzles and not see something. And how once something like that quad is pointed out, how it then jumps out at you.:)

Was my technique valid, or did I just get lucky? I figured since R5C1, R5C2, and R6C2 were the only cells that contained 1, 3, & 7, that I could eliminate the 8s and 9s from those cells.
RickM
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 August 2005

Postby SteveF » Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:09 pm

Perfectly valid. Some time back there was a thread in this forum discussing the two alternative ways of looking at the situation.
SteveF
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 26 March 2005


Return to Advanced solving techniques