sigsky wrote:I find determining the possibles for a common sudoku is tedious, but for a samurai it borders on torture.
enxio27 wrote:I find calculating pencil marks (possibles) to be tedious and fraught with potential mistakes, as well. That's why I have software to do it for me.
Sounds like poor technique to me, especially if you're prone to make mistakes. I'd estimate the error rate of my pencil&paper solving to be at most 5/1000, regardless of puzzle type or difficulty and whether I use pencil marks or not. It's quite fast too, relatively speaking, though it's always been a secondary goal compared to reliability (I'd really hate to restart a puzzle), good solving aids (showing all native and grouped strong links when necessary), a visually pleasing end-result (without using an eraser), and a layered structure for different levels of puzzles (to avoid hunting flies with cruise missiles).
Of course manual pencil-marking is still tedious and slow compared to using a good software solver with adequate visual aids, which is why I rarely bother nowadays. Perfecting the technique was the interesting part, but I can't think of how it could be improved any more.