September 28, 2019

Post puzzles for others to solve here.

September 28, 2019

Postby ArkieTech » Sat Sep 28, 2019 9:56 am

Code: Select all
 *-----------*
 |.1.|8.2|.3.|
 |9.7|4.1|2.6|
 |...|567|...|
 |---+---+---|
 |8..|2.6|..1|
 |...|.8.|...|
 |5..|7.4|..3|
 |---+---+---|
 |...|378|...|
 |3.2|1.5|6.7|
 |.4.|6.9|.1.|
 *-----------*



Play/Print this puzzle online
dan
User avatar
ArkieTech
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: NW Arkansas USA

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SpAce » Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:41 am

Code: Select all
.----------------------.---------.----------------------.
|  46      1     456   | 8  9  2 |   7     3     a[45]  |
|  9       58    7     | 4  3  1 |   2     58      6    |
|  24      238  b348   | 5  6  7 |   1     489     489  |
:----------------------+---------+----------------------:
|  8       379  b349   | 2  5  6 |   49    479     1    |
| c12(4)6  267  c1(4)6 | 9  8  3 | c(45)   24567   2-45 |
|  5       269   69    | 7  1  4 |   8     269     3    |
:----------------------+---------+----------------------:
|  16      569   1569  | 3  7  8 |   49-5  2459    2459 |
|  3       89    2     | 1  4  5 |   6     89      7    |
|  7       4    b58    | 6  2  9 |   3     1     a[5]8  |
'----------------------'---------'----------------------'

(45)r19c9 = (583-4)r934c3 = (45)r5c137 => -45 r5c9, -5 r7c7; stte
-SpAce-: Show
Code: Select all
   *             |    |               |    |    *
        *        |=()=|    /  _  \    |=()=|               *
            *    |    |   |-=( )=-|   |    |      *
     *                     \  ¯  /                   *   

"If one is to understand the great mystery, one must study all its aspects, not just the dogmatic narrow view of the Jedi."
User avatar
SpAce
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: 22 May 2017

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SteveG48 » Sat Sep 28, 2019 2:35 pm

Code: Select all
 *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
 | 46     1      456    | 8      9      2      | 7      3      45     |
 | 9      58     7      | 4      3      1      | 2     b58     6      |
 |c24    c238    348    | 5      6      7      | 1     c489    489    |
 *----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
 | 8     d379    349    | 2      5      6      |e49    d479    1      |
 | 1246   267    146    | 9      8      3      | 45     24567  245    |
 | 5      269    69     | 7      1      4      | 8      269    3      |
 *----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
 | 16     56-9   156-9  | 3      7      8      |f459    2459   2459   |
 | 3    ab89     2      | 1      4      5      | 6     b8-9    7      |
 | 7      4      58     | 6      2      9      | 3      1      58     |
 *--------------------------------------------------------------------*


9r8c2 = 8r8c2&(89)r28c8 - (8|9=234)r3c128 - (3|4=79)r4c28 - 9r4c7 = 9r7c7 => -9r7c23,r8c8 ; stte
Steve
User avatar
SteveG48
2019 Supporter
 
Posts: 4481
Joined: 08 November 2013
Location: Orlando, Florida

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SteveG48 » Sat Sep 28, 2019 5:57 pm

SpAce, that is one devilishly clever solution. So tell us how you even determined that those eliminations, two of which are needed, would give you the singles finish.
Steve
User avatar
SteveG48
2019 Supporter
 
Posts: 4481
Joined: 08 November 2013
Location: Orlando, Florida

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SpAce » Sat Sep 28, 2019 9:53 pm

SteveG48 wrote:SpAce, that is one devilishly clever solution. So tell us how you even determined that those eliminations, two of which are needed, would give you the singles finish.

Thanks, Steve! I found the eliminations via my normal coloring routine. Then I just tested them together after noting they didn't do much by themselves, and somewhat surprisingly the progress indicator (that you taught me to look at!) turned white. Even more surprising was that it wasn't the -45r5c9 that did the trick but the -4r5c9 and -5r7c7 together. So, none of it was planned or even predicted -- just standard procedure.

The best surprise was that the multi-elimination could be written with a simple and pretty chain. It got even better when I checked after posting what Hodoku would have used. Until then I'd assumed there were probably plenty of simple AIC solutions available, but Hodoku actually needed a forcing chain for a single-stepper. At that point I was even happier with the lucky solution that had presented itself :)
User avatar
SpAce
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: 22 May 2017

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby eleven » Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:07 pm

Very nice !
eleven
 
Posts: 3152
Joined: 10 February 2008

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SpAce » Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:25 pm

eleven wrote:Very nice !

Thanks, eleven! Much appreciated!
User avatar
SpAce
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: 22 May 2017

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SpAce » Sat Sep 28, 2019 11:49 pm

Hi Steve,

SteveG48 wrote:9r8c2 = 8r8c2&(89)r28c8 - (8|9=234)r3c128 - (3|4=79)r4c28 - 9r4c7 = 9r7c7 => -9r7c23,r8c8 ; stte

I really like this solution too, but I don't see how the first link gives you (89)r28c8 (directly). Nevertheless, it can be easily fixed without any changes to the rest of the chain. For example:

(98)b7p59 = (89)r3c3,r8c8 - ...
User avatar
SpAce
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: 22 May 2017

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SteveG48 » Sun Sep 29, 2019 12:14 am

Thanks, SpAce. You're right; I blundered.
Steve
User avatar
SteveG48
2019 Supporter
 
Posts: 4481
Joined: 08 November 2013
Location: Orlando, Florida

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby Cenoman » Sun Sep 29, 2019 9:06 am

I join others' kudos for SpAce's awsome solution.
I was just blown away yesterday. I couldn't post anything !

EDIT: of course, I meant awsome. Sorry SpAce, for confusing awful and awsome. There are gaps :( in my knowledge of English. Thank you SCLT, for spotting the misuse.
Last edited by Cenoman on Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Cenoman
Cenoman
 
Posts: 2975
Joined: 21 November 2016
Location: France

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SCLT » Sun Sep 29, 2019 12:42 pm

Cenoman wrote:I join others' kudos for SpAce's awful solution.


Perhaps you mean "awesome", rather than "awful"?
SCLT
 
Posts: 171
Joined: 06 August 2013

Re: September 28, 2019

Postby SpAce » Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:10 am

Thanks, Cenoman and SCLT! I appreciate it! :)
User avatar
SpAce
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: 22 May 2017


Return to Puzzles