by m_b_metcalf » Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:09 pm
::: comment :::
Mauricio wrote:- Code: Select all
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 1 | . . . | 2 . . |
| . 2 3 | . . . | 4 5 . |
| 6 5 . | . . . | . 1 7 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 2 . 8 | . . . |
| . . . | 5 3 4 | . . . |
| . . . | 9 . 7 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 1 6 . | . . . | . 4 2 |
| . 4 5 | . . . | 1 3 . |
| . . 8 | . . . | 9 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+ ED =9.0/9.0/2.6
A drawback of this pattern is that the diamond rating will never be more than 2.6.
True. But it was submitted before ED was invented.
Regards,
Mike Metcalf