ronk wrote:If any of the four cells contains a given, a clue, the set is an "unavoidable set". If none of the four cells contains a given, it follows that the "unavoidable set" is avoidable. IOW, if none of the four cells contains a given, the set is an "avoidable set".
Unavoidable Sets are usually identified in the solution-grid, typically used in the quest for a puzzle with a minimal number of clues.
Here's a randomly generated solution:
- Code: Select all
+-------+-------+-------+
|*5*3*8 | 4 7 2 | 1 6 9 |
| 1 7 9 | 3 8 6 | 5 4 2 |
| 6 2 4 | 9 5 1 | 3 7 8 |
+-------+-------+-------+
|*3*5*7 | 2 4 8 | 6 9 1 |
| 8 4 6 | 1 9 5 | 2 3 7 |
| 9 1 2 | 6 3 7 | 8 5 4 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 2 9 5 | 7 1 3 | 4 8 6 |
| 7 8 1 | 5 6 4 | 9 2 3 |
| 4 6 3 | 8 2 9 | 7 1 5 |
+-------+-------+-------+
Note the 35-pair in R14C12.
A pattern such as that one is an Unavoidable Set, which literally means that when making a puzzle out of the grid, e.g. by erasing numbers one at a time, you can't avoid leaving an initial clue in at least one of these cells. If you didn't, the puzzle wouldn't have a unique solution.
And this is precisely what makes AUS-eliminations work. If an AUS has an unsolved corner, and none of the solved corners were initial clues, you can remove the "deadly" candidate from the remaining corner.
Vidar
(Edit: Added the sample solution.)