turnthepage wrote:"I don't fully understand the "X-Wing" and "Swordfish" techniques. .."
If case you need further help to understand the "X-wing" technique note that candidate 4 appears twice in row3 (r3) and also twice in r6. You'll also notice this same candidate occupies the same two columns (c1 and c5).
This leaves you two options:
(a) either the 4 goes in r3c1 which then places the other 4 in r6c5 or
(b) the 4 goes in r3c5 which then places the other 4 in r6c1.
You still don't know which of these two options is correct but what you can now deduce is that any other candidate 4's in either of the two columns1 and 5 can be excluded - so exclude the 4's from r1c1 and r5c5.
Remember that the "X-wing" technique requires the particular candidate to appear twice and only twice
either in two
rows and sharing the same two columns in which case the eventual exclusions occur in
columns or, using the same logic, where the particular candidate appears twice and only twice in two
columns and sharing the same two rows then the exclusions occur in
rows.
If you click on
HERE you can read up more details about the concepts of both the "X-wing" and "Swordfish" techniques.
Cec