My First Hard Without Pencilmark

Everything about Sudoku that doesn't fit in one of the other sections

My First Hard Without Pencilmark

Postby jphamel » Mon Jan 02, 2006 4:09 pm

Just posting to how much it means for to have completed my first Hard puzzle without any pencil mark or color to help.
Just the grid and a pen, yes a pen no pencil, no mistake.

This is a big step for me.

Unbelievable how one can feel for doing this.

Also rated hard in Pappocom.

Anyway here's the grid from the book.


Code: Select all
 *-----------*
 |2..|.7.|..6|
 |...|2.3|..8|
 |8..|4..|.5.|
 |---+---+---|
 |...|...|43.|
 |.2.|.1.|.7.|
 |.71|...|...|
 |---+---+---|
 |.5.|..4|..9|
 |6..|7.2|...|
 |9..|.3.|..4|
 *-----------*



JPHamel
jphamel
 
Posts: 17
Joined: 27 December 2005

Postby PaulIQ164 » Mon Jan 02, 2006 6:59 pm

Hurrah! Well done. I think a Hard puzzle sans pencilmarks is the pinnacle of sudoku achievement.
PaulIQ164
 
Posts: 533
Joined: 16 July 2005

Postby jphamel » Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:59 pm

Thank you!

I did 3 more. It seems to become easier with each completed grid, maybe the power of visualisation is getting stronger who knows.

JPHamel
jphamel
 
Posts: 17
Joined: 27 December 2005

Postby Del » Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:38 pm

Have you seen the puzzle in the Christmas edition of the New Scientist?
Here it is:

x x x | x x x | 6 x 1
x 4 x | 2 x x | x x x
x x x | x x x | x x x
------ ------- ------
x x x | 7 x x | x 2 x
1 3 x | x x x | x x x
5 x x | 4 x x | x x x
------ ------- ------
4 x 2 | x 1 x | x x x
x x x | x 5 6 | 3 x x
x x x | x x x | x 8 x

I managed to find 34 figures before having to resort to filling in the candidates. It still was not easy to complete.
Del
 
Posts: 13
Joined: 27 October 2005

Postby jphamel » Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:34 pm

I will try it tonight and see how far I can go!

Thanks for the puzzle!

JPHamel

Code: Select all
 *-----------*
 |...|...|6.1|
 |.4.|2..|...|
 |...|...|...|
 |---+---+---|
 |...|7..|.2.|
 |13.|...|...|
 |5..|4..|...|
 |---+---+---|
 |4.2|.1.|...|
 |...|.56|3..|
 |...|...|.8.|
 *-----------*


 *-----------*
 |2..|5.4|6.1|
 |.41|2..|.5.|
 |...|1..|2.4|
 |---+---+---|
 |..4|7.1|.2.|
 |13.|625|4..|
 |52.|4..|.1.|
 |---+---+---|
 |482|317|.6.|
 |719|856|342|
 |...|942|187|
 *-----------*


Well I got this far without pencil mark
jphamel
 
Posts: 17
Joined: 27 December 2005

Postby Shazbot » Fri Jan 06, 2006 7:05 am

I've been doing the Extreme puzzles in Simple Sudoku, and getting not-too-bad at them using pencilmarks all the time. But when I was accused of cheating (it highlights naked singles for you), I thought I'd turn off pencilmarks and solve as far as I could without them (I also found I'd notice some placements that weren't clear when using pencilmarks). I've actually been surprised to find that I've been able to solve some EXTREME puzzles without having to turn pencilmarks on at all! The most complicated thing I'd use would be locked candidates and naked pairs, which aren't TOO difficult to spot without looking at pencilmarks!

I don't know if I just happened to look at the right cells, or if the puzzles were given an incorrect rating to start with...? Haven't ever dubbed them into Pappocom to see if it agrees with the rating - maybe I should.
Shazbot
 
Posts: 220
Joined: 24 September 2005

Postby jphamel » Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:13 pm

I noticed too that it was easier to spot things without pencils marks.
And gets easier the more we do it, I can go as far as naked triple before having to resort to pencil mark. And locked candidates are also easy to spot.

I think that some of those hard or very hard puzzle are easier to work without PM.

I did dub them in Pappocom, and they are all rated V. HARD.

I don`t know, maybe our brain is developping a sudoku lobe because of the addiction.

They should put a label on those books and software.
Warning: Sudokus are Highly addictive. Danger increases with use.

JPHamel
jphamel
 
Posts: 17
Joined: 27 December 2005

Postby angusj » Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:25 pm

Shazbot wrote:I've actually been surprised to find that I've been able to solve some EXTREME puzzles without having to turn pencilmarks on at all! The most complicated thing I'd use would be locked candidates and naked pairs, which aren't TOO difficult to spot without looking at pencilmarks!

Hi Sharon. I'm sure you must have made some lucky (though inadvertent) guesses.
angusj
 
Posts: 306
Joined: 12 June 2005

Re: My First Hard Without Pencilmark

Postby QBasicMac » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:33 pm

jphamel wrote:Also rated hard in Pappocom.


Can't imagine why. It had only singles. I can't imagine how these puzzles are rated. Not by a human, it seems. I would rate it Medium.

But congratulations anyway! I couldn't do it without pencilmarks. (At least tiny cheat-pencilmarks in the border). Short-term memory too weak, I guess.

Keep it up!

Mac
QBasicMac
 
Posts: 441
Joined: 13 July 2005

Re: My First Hard Without Pencilmark

Postby jphamel » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:55 pm

QBasicMac wrote:
But congratulations anyway! I couldn't do it without pencilmarks. (At least tiny cheat-pencilmarks in the border). Short-term memory too weak, I guess.

Keep it up!

Mac


Thanks!

Well my short term memory can handle at least 1 naked triple when I have my mind on it and nobody is around to disturb me.

JPHamel
jphamel
 
Posts: 17
Joined: 27 December 2005

Postby Shazbot » Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:32 am

angusj wrote:Hi Sharon. I'm sure you must have made some lucky (though inadvertent) guesses.

No - definitely no guesses - it's happened to me on 2 or 3 puzzles. Next time I find one I'll copy it here somewhere. Wish I'd saved them at the time.
Shazbot
 
Posts: 220
Joined: 24 September 2005

Postby angusj » Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:40 am

Shazbot wrote:No - definitely no guesses

I didn't mean to imply that you'd made a guess. What I meant is that you probably made a correct placement based on an incorrect premise (something I think most of us have done from time to time).

Shazbot wrote:Next time I find one I'll copy it here somewhere.

That's a good idea.
angusj
 
Posts: 306
Joined: 12 June 2005


Return to General