Ok, they warned it would be 'very difficult' (offering 3 easier ones to start with). Eagerly I started to pluck at it, and 'ouch'...
Code:
.....84.6
.2..9..53
.........
.....4...
....739..
6.9.1..7.
7.3.....9
861...2..
..23...6.
End Code
Way above my horizon.
Got it down to:
Code:
.....84.6
.2..9..53
.........
...9.46..
...6739..
6.9.1.37.
7.3.....9
861..923.
..23...6.
End Code
plus some extra reduction of candidates, but that was "it".
I found the Swiss program "Sudoku Explainer" very useful and informative, it usually leads into the proper direction.
Its 'rating' tells me that I am a sub "2.8" player in general, maybe with potential for more in the future?
I have to admit though that hunting such an obscure "Turbot Fish" X chain is something I do NOT really enjoy.
C'mon: if you want to check all the possible chains (that's TRYING for me, not really REASONING!) for all empty cells, how long will such an exercise take you on average, with 50 empty cells to go?
How deep is such trial and error approach reasonable? How much different is this method from simple "guess hunting" down whenever ambiguous paths appear, until it fails?
I am afraid I am a little league player only - so YOU enjoy this one!
michael