- Code: Select all
+---------------------+-----------------+---------------
| 7 289 289 | 5 4 3 | 1 289 6 |
| 3 249 2459 | 1 8 6 | c25 29 7 |
| 58 1 6 | 9 2 7 | 4 3 58 |
+---------------------+-----------------+---------------+
| 2568 23468 23458 | 68 7 48 | 9 148 158 |
| 1 4689 7 | 3 e56 489 | d58 48 2 |
| 589 489 4589 | 2 f15 *489-1 | 6 7 3 |
+---------------------+-----------------+---------------+
| 289 23789 12389 | 678 *6-1 5 | 2378 128 4 |
| 68 3678 138 | 4 9 2 | 378 5 18 |
| 4 5 a*128# | 78 3 *18 | b278 6 9 |
+---------------------+-----------------+---------------+
Examples regarding potential issues (IMO) about notation standards...
(*)Siamese Kraken Franken 1x1 Fish(1)r9\(b8,c6) + rfr9c3(#):
(1-2)r9c3 = r9c7 - (2=5)r2c7 - r5c7 = r5c5 - (5=1)r6c5 => -1 r6c6,r7c5; ste
Or, simply start the chain with (1)r9c6 for the more familiar Kraken (1)r9c36:
(1)r9c6 = (1-2)r9c3 = r9c7 - (2=5)r2c7 - r5c7 = r5c5 - (5=1)r6c5 => -1 r6c6,r7c5; ste
As explained by SpAce
here, the Siamese 1-Fish cover notation (b8,c6) is a necessary complication due to the two separate covers available to provide the double elimination. Except for that, the notation clearly follows standard UFG guidelines.
The two XY chains shown above use standard Eureka notation comprising leading digit(s) adjacent to their row/column positions (same digits need not be repeated).
On the other hand, postings to date by P.O. use a totally unfamiliar notation, at least for me. I think some recent changes have been made to the main puzzle board, but everything else below the "depth" level is a mystery. I look forward to more complete explanations of the notation conventions.
I did also find it interesting that denis_berthier's posting on this same puzzle used two separate "bi-value" chains to reproduce the two eliminations generated by the 1-Fish or by the Kraken cell approach. However, I'm not familiar with the chain notation used although I can with effort slowly translate it to Eureka format where "bi-value" refers only to a 2-digit cell.
SteveC