eleven wrote:Awesome pattern, [...]
If r6c9<>6, (79r6c69) [...], contradiction
=> 6r6c9, bte
Awesome, I confirm !
I suspected that the solutions in two steps above (mine included) were not shye's expectation
Just a side comment. The pattern applies also to cell r9c6 => 2r9c6; both placements 6r6c9 and 2r9c6 => ste
AddedAn attempt to write the pattern as chains:
- Code: Select all
+------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------+
| 1 d689 d679 | 2 3 c789 | 4 5 c6789 |
| e379 3489 3479 | 1789 5 6 | 1379 3789 2 |
| e3679 2 5 | 1789 1789 4 | 13679 3789 16789 |
+------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------+
| 2 469 469 | 146789 146789 3 | 1679 4789 5 |
| 5 7 3469 | 14689 2 189 | 1369 3489 1689 |
| f369 1 8 | 5 4679 hgba79 | 23679 23479 679 |
+------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------+
| 4 69 12679 | 16789 16789 125789 | 2579 279 3 |
| 8 39 12379 | 1379 179 12579 | 2579 6 4 |
| f3679 5 23679 | 34679 4679 279 | 8 1 hgba79 |
+------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------+
(9)r6c6|r9c9 = (7)r6c6&r9c9 - r1c69 = r1c23 - r23c1 = r69c1 - (7)r6c6&r9c9 = (9)r6c6|r9c9 => +9 r6c6|r9c9 (at least one cell is 9)
(7)r6c6|r9c9 = (9)r6c6&r9c9 - r1c69 = r1c23 - r23c1 = r69c1 - (9)r6c6&r9c9 = (7)r6c6|r9c9 => +7 r6c6|r9c9 (at least one cell is 7)
=> Remote Pair (79)r6c6, r9c9 => -79 r6c9, r9c6; ste