June 10, 2014

Post puzzles for others to solve here.

June 10, 2014

Postby ArkieTech » Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:55 pm

Code: Select all
 *-----------*
 |...|95.|.7.|
 |..7|..3|1..|
 |.4.|..1|..8|
 |---+---+---|
 |.53|..9|8..|
 |17.|...|.94|
 |..8|7..|51.|
 |---+---+---|
 |8..|1..|.4.|
 |..2|5..|3..|
 |.1.|.86|...|
 *-----------*


Play/Print this puzzle online
dan
User avatar
ArkieTech
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: NW Arkansas USA

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby Leren » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:44 pm

Code: Select all
*--------------------------------------------------------------*
| 3    a26    1      | 9     5     8      | 4     7     26     |
|b269   8     7      | 246   24    3      | 1     25    2569   |
| 569-2 4     59     | 26    7     1      | 69    3     8      |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
|b24    5     3      | 24    1     9      | 8     6     7      |
| 1     7     6      | 8     3     5      | 2     9     4      |
|b249   29    8      | 7     6     24     | 5     1     3      |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 8     3     59     | 1     29    27     | 679   4     569    |
| 679   69    2      | 5     49    47     | 3     8     1      |
| 579   1     4      | 3     8     6      | 79    25    259    |
*--------------------------------------------------------------*

ALS XZ Rule: X = 6, Z = 2: (2=6) r1c2 - (6=2) r246c1 => - 2 r3c1; stte

Leren
Leren
 
Posts: 5117
Joined: 03 June 2012

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby SteveG48 » Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:06 am

Code: Select all
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 | 3     26    1     | 9     5     8     | 4     7     26    |
 | 269   8     7     | 246   24    3     | 1     25    2569  |
 | 2569  4    b59    |c26    7     1     |c69    3     8     |
 *-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 |e24    5     3     |d24    1     9     | 8     6     7     |
 | 1     7     6     | 8     3     5     | 2     9     4     |
 | 249  f29    8     | 7     6     24    | 5     1     3     |
 *-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 8     3    a59    | 1     29    27    | 679   4     569   |
 | 679   6-9   2     | 5     49    47    | 3     8     1     |
 | 579   1     4     | 3     8     6     | 79    25    259   |
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*


(9)r7c3 = r3c3 - (9=26)r3c47 - (2)r4c4 = r4c1 - (2=9)r5c2 => -9 r8c2 ; stte
Steve
User avatar
SteveG48
2019 Supporter
 
Posts: 4479
Joined: 08 November 2013
Location: Orlando, Florida

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby pjb » Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:44 am

Code: Select all
3     C26     1      | 9      5      8      |  4      7     B26     
269    8      7      | 246   c24     3      |  1      25     2569   
2569   4      59     |b26     7      1      |Aa69     3      8     
---------------------+----------------------+----------------------
24     5      3      | 24     1      9      |  8      6      7     
1      7      6      | 8      3      5      |  2      9      4     
249    29     8      | 7      6      24     |  5      1      3     
---------------------+----------------------+----------------------
8      3      59     | 1      29     27     |  679    4      569   
679  eD69     2      | 5     d49     47     |  3      8      1     
579    1      4      | 3      8      6      |  79     25     259   


(6)r3c7 - (6=2)r3c4 - (2=4)r2c5 - (4=9)r8c5 - r8c2
(6)r3c7 - (6=2)r1c9 - (2=6)r1c2 - (2=9)r8c2
therefore r3c7 <> 6; stte

Phil
pjb
2014 Supporter
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: 11 September 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby daj95376 » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:02 am

pjb wrote:
Code: Select all
3     C26     1      | 9      5      8      |  4      7     B26     
269    8      7      | 246   c24     3      |  1      25     2569   
2569   4      59     |b26     7      1      |Aa69     3      8     
---------------------+----------------------+----------------------
24     5      3      | 24     1      9      |  8      6      7     
1      7      6      | 8      3      5      |  2      9      4     
249    29     8      | 7      6      24     |  5      1      3     
---------------------+----------------------+----------------------
8      3      59     | 1      29     27     |  679    4      569   
679  eD69     2      | 5     d49     47     |  3      8      1     
579    1      4      | 3      8      6      |  79     25     259   


(6)r3c7 - (6=2)r3c4 - (2=4)r2c5 - (4=9)r8c5 - r8c2
(6)r3c7 - (6=2)r1c9 - (2=6)r1c2 - (6=9)r8c2
therefore r3c7 <> 6; stte

An unusual way to present an XY-Chain.

(6=2)r3c4 - (2=4)r2c5 - (4=9)r8c5 - (9=6)r8c2 - (6=2)r1c2 - (2=6)r1c9 => -6 r3c7
daj95376
2014 Supporter
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: 15 May 2006

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby daj95376 » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:12 am

Leren wrote:
Code: Select all
*--------------------------------------------------------------*
| 3    a26    1      | 9     5     8      | 4     7     26     |
|b269   8     7      | 246   24    3      | 1     25    2569   |
| 569-2 4     59     | 26    7     1      | 69    3     8      |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
|b24    5     3      | 24    1     9      | 8     6     7      |
| 1     7     6      | 8     3     5      | 2     9     4      |
|b249   29    8      | 7     6     24     | 5     1     3      |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 8     3     59     | 1     29    27     | 679   4     569    |
| 679   69    2      | 5     49    47     | 3     8     1      |
| 579   1     4      | 3     8     6      | 79    25    259    |
*--------------------------------------------------------------*

ALS XZ Rule: X = 6, Z = 2: (2=6) r1c2 - (6=2) r246c1 => - 2 r3c1; stte

A boxed perspective of your cells:

Code: Select all
 (24=9)r46c1 - (9=26)r1c2,r2c1  =>  -2 r3c1
daj95376
2014 Supporter
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: 15 May 2006

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby 7b53 » Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:34 am

pjb wrote:
Code: Select all
3     C26     1      | 9      5      8      |  4      7     B26     
269    8      7      | 246   c24     3      |  1      25     2569   
2569   4      59     |b26     7      1      |Aa69     3      8     
---------------------+----------------------+----------------------
24     5      3      | 24     1      9      |  8      6      7     
1      7      6      | 8      3      5      |  2      9      4     
249    29     8      | 7      6      24     |  5      1      3     
---------------------+----------------------+----------------------
8      3      59     | 1      29     27     |  679    4      569   
679  eD69     2      | 5     d49     47     |  3      8      1     
579    1      4      | 3      8      6      |  79     25     259   


(6)r3c7 - (6=2)r3c4 - (2=4)r2c5 - (4=9)r8c5 - r8c2
(6)r3c7 - (6=2)r1c9 - (2=6)r1c2 - (6=9)r8c2
therefore r3c7 <> 6; stte

seems like Phil is also listing other strong-links..
(6)r3c4 = (6)r1c9
(2)r2c5 = (2)r1c2
(4)r8c5 = (6)r8c2
7b53
2012 Supporter
 
Posts: 156
Joined: 01 January 2012
Location: New York

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby ArkieTech » Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:15 am

Code: Select all
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 | 3     26    1     | 9     5     8     | 4     7     26    |
 | 269   8     7     | 246   4-2   3     | 1     25    2569  |
 | 2569  4    a59    |a26    7     1     |a69    3     8     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 24    5     3     | 24    1     9     | 8     6     7     |
 | 1     7     6     | 8     3     5     | 2     9     4     |
 | 249   29    8     | 7     6     24    | 5     1     3     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 8     3    b59    | 1    b29    27    | 679   4     569   |
 | 679   69    2     | 5     49    47    | 3     8     1     |
 | 579   1     4     | 3     8     6     | 79    25    259   |
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
(2=5)r3c347-(5=2)r7c35 => -2r2c5; ste
dan
User avatar
ArkieTech
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: NW Arkansas USA

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby Marty R. » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:35 pm

Code: Select all
+------------+-----------+-------------+
| 3    26 1  | 9   5  8  | 4   7  26   |
| 269  8  7  | 246 24 3  | 1   25 2569 |
| 2569 4  59 | 26  7  1  | 69  3  8    |
+------------+-----------+-------------+
| 24   5  3  | 24  1  9  | 8   6  7    |
| 1    7  6  | 8   3  5  | 2   9  4    |
| 249  29 8  | 7   6  24 | 5   1  3    |
+------------+-----------+-------------+
| 8    3  59 | 1   29 27 | 679 4  569  |
| 679  69 2  | 5   49 47 | 3   8  1    |
| 579  1  4  | 3   8  6  | 79  25 259  |
+------------+-----------+-------------+

Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site

Same elimination as Dan, using an XY-Chain.

(2=9)r7c5-r7c3=r3c3-(9=6)r3c7-(6=2)r3c4=>r2c5<>2
Marty R.
 
Posts: 1508
Joined: 23 October 2012
Location: Rochester, New York, USA

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby Marty R. » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:41 pm

Phil,

Is there a name for your solution?
Marty R.
 
Posts: 1508
Joined: 23 October 2012
Location: Rochester, New York, USA

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby Luke » Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:03 pm

Marty R. wrote:Phil,

Is there a name for your solution?

Bifurcation?
User avatar
Luke
2015 Supporter
 
Posts: 435
Joined: 06 August 2006
Location: Southern Northern California

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby pjb » Tue Jun 10, 2014 11:50 pm

Marty,

This is just one technique I picked up playing with Sudoku Explainer. It is called "contradiction forcing chains" or something like that. It uses the approach that if you find a chain starting with A = true which implies B = true, and find a second chain again starting with A = true but which implies B = false; then the original assumption that that A = true must be false. The team of gurus that created "skfr" know infinitely more about the various chains in SE that I.

Phil
pjb
2014 Supporter
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: 11 September 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby Marty R. » Wed Jun 11, 2014 12:03 am

Thank you.
Marty R.
 
Posts: 1508
Joined: 23 October 2012
Location: Rochester, New York, USA

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby DonM » Thu Jun 12, 2014 6:45 am

pjb wrote:Marty,

This is just one technique I picked up playing with Sudoku Explainer. It is called "contradiction forcing chains" or something like that. It uses the approach that if you find a chain starting with A = true which implies B = true, and find a second chain again starting with A = true but which implies B = false; then the original assumption that that A = true must be false. The team of gurus that created "skfr" know infinitely more about the various chains in SE that I.

Phil


Or as Luke said, Bifurcation.

The techniques used by Sudoku Explainer were pretty much considered out-of-date circa 2006-7. IMO, it's only present-day value is its ability to assign a broadly useful 'difficulty' score to a puzzle.
DonM
2013 Supporter
 
Posts: 487
Joined: 13 January 2008

Re: June 10, 2014

Postby daj95376 » Thu Jun 12, 2014 4:21 pm

DonM wrote:
pjb wrote:Marty,

This is just one technique I picked up playing with Sudoku Explainer. It is called "contradiction forcing chains" or something like that. It uses the approach that if you find a chain starting with A = true which implies B = true, and find a second chain again starting with A = true but which implies B = false; then the original assumption that that A = true must be false. The team of gurus that created "skfr" know infinitely more about the various chains in SE that I.

Phil


Or as Luke said, Bifurcation.

The techniques used by Sudoku Explainer were pretty much considered out-of-date circa 2006-7. IMO, it's only present-day value is its ability to assign a broadly useful 'difficulty' score to a puzzle.

_

Sudopedia Mirror wrote:_

Bifurcation

A limited form of Trial & Error where only constraints with 2 remaining candidates are considered.

When there are only 2 candidates left for a constraint, one of them must be true and the other must be false. In bifurcation, both branches of the fork are tried by placing the candidate in its cell and solving the puzzle from that point forward. When a contradiction is found, the remaining candidate can be placed.

Bifurcation has a bad reputation in the Sudoku community because it relies on backtracking and looks similar to guessing. Many advanced solving techniques were introduced to reduce the need for bifurcation.

All I see in Phil's forcing chain is a candidate with two chains/streams leading to contradicting conclusions on another candidate.

Code: Select all
(6)r3c7 - (6=2)r3c4 - (2=4)r2c5 - (4=9)r8c5 - r8c2
(6)r3c7 - (6=2)r1c9 - (2=6)r1c2 - (6=9)r8c2
therefore r3c7 <> 6; stte

If he had just one chain/stream for 6r3c7 leading to a contradiction, then I would consider it bifurcation -- with the implication that 9r3c7 must be true. For example:

Code: Select all
(6*)r3c7 - (6=2)r3c4 - (2=4)r2c5 - (4=9)r8c5 - (9=6)r8c2 - (6=2)r1c2 - (*62)r1c9; contradiction

_
daj95376
2014 Supporter
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: 15 May 2006

Next

Return to Puzzles