Pat wrote:so, how about this Layout:
Alternative layouts in each case show the 'hollow' pattern better:
- Code: Select all
1 9 . 7 . . . 2 6
2 . . 8 . 3 . . 5
. . . . . . . . .
. 8 . . . . . 7 1
. . . . . . . . .
5 1 . . . . . 4 .
. . . . . . . . .
3 . . 6 . 5 . . 9
4 7 . . . 9 . 8 2 Pat's
1 8 . 5 3 . . 6 7
2 . . 1 . . . . 5
. . . . . . . . .
5 9 . . . . . 8 2
7 . . . . . . . 3
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
4 . . 2 . . . . 6
3 5 . 8 7 . . 4 1 Dr. Octagon's
Hollow layouts were a topic of discussion
earlier.
Regards,
Mike Metcalf