lunababy_moonchild wrote:However, I think that 70 minutes for that puzzle is amazing and am wondering why it is you are now sticking to the classic 9 x 9 grid?
...because 70 mins to complete something which doesn't really require much thinking about is a waste of time! I can do the similar puzzles in The Times in roughly 10-15 minutes if I want, and it's just as satisfying.
I also found having to scan across 16 cells (rather than 9) tedious, and although I'd probably get faster if I practised, there's an element of not being bothered about doing so.
I've been wanting to try a 16x16 for a while now, so thanks for posting it, and the inherent call to action.